Chandrakant S/O Vitthalsa Mamarde v. Additional Commissioner, Amravati, Division Amravati and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Bombay High Court Nagpur Bench, Rohit W. Joshi J. (Writ Petition No.5348 of 2024, decided 08/06/2026): mutation entry No.513 recorded 09.07.2002 on the sole basis of an unregistered deed of correction dated 29.04.2002, shifting area between petitioner's Survey No.113 (8.25 to 7.21 H.R.) and respondent No.6's Survey No.105 (6.16 to 7.20 H.R.); deed under challenge in pending Regular Civil Suit No.280 of 2021; S.D.O. rejected petitioner's condonation-of-delay appeal and Additional Commissioner Amravati Division maintained rejection. Petition disposed with directions: mutation entries to follow civil-suit adjudication; suit-pendency entry in revenue records and in every 7/12 extract. Relevant to research on mutation entries resting on unregistered/unadjudicated documents and annotation of civil-suit pendency in 7/12 extracts.
What did the court decide?
Petition disposed of with directions: (i) the mutation entries concerning the suit properties will be recorded in accordance with the adjudication of Regular Civil Suit No.280 of 2021; (ii) the concerned Revenue Authority will record an entry of the pendency of that suit in the revenue records pertaining to the suit properties; and (iii) every 7/12 extract issued in respect of the suit properties will bear an entry of the suit's pendency.