Apparao Shripatrao Patil and Anr. v. State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Interim procedural order dated 10.04.2026 by Ashwin D. Bhobe, J., Bombay High Court (Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction), in WRIT PETITION NO. 5182 OF 2024 (file ref 915-WP-5182-2024.doc): Apparao Shripatrao Patil and Anr. (petitioners, through Kalyani Mangave) v. The State of Maharashtra and Anr. (respondents; Rajesh More for Respondent No. 2, APP Poonam Bhosale for the State). Records that a chargesheet was filed during pendency; grants consensual leave to amend the petition (additional averments/grounds and a prayer clause on the chargesheet) and to place the chargesheet on record; allows two weeks for amendment; directs supply of amended copies within 7 days thereafter; lists the matter on 08.06.2026. Contains no statutes, precedents, framed issues, merits holdings or monetary quantum; useful only for procedural posture, not as authority for any point of law.
What did the court decide?
Interim procedural relief: leave granted to amend the memo of the Petition to add averments/grounds and a prayer clause in respect of the chargesheet and to produce the chargesheet on record; two weeks' time granted for the amendment; amended copy to be supplied to the office of the APP and the learned Advocate on record for Respondent No. 2 within 7 days thereafter; Petition to be listed on 08.06.2026 by consent.