P. v. Surendran v the Apex Grievance Redressal Committee
Case brief
What is this about?
Bombay HC common order dt. 30-04-2026 (Karnik & Modak JJ.) in W.P. 4550/2025 and eleven connected writ petitions by SRA flat occupants (P.V. Surendran; A.G. Monteiro; S.A. Fernandes; V.S. Singh; S.A. Pinto; R.F. Dmello; H.S.H.S. Hanjara; S.R. Yerram; A.A. Fernandes; R. Abdul Jalil; D.A. Poojary; S. Subhash More) v. The Apex Grievance Redressal Committee & Ors.: petitioners holding Orders of regularisation treated as in lawful occupation; interim order dt. 6-11-2025 of the Court in a different case held inapplicable to these petitions; regularisation order left open to challenge by complainant respondent No.5 in appropriate proceedings; petitions allowed per prayer clauses (a) and (b) and disposed of.
What did the court decide?
Petitions allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b) and disposed of; all contentions of respondent No.5 kept open to challenge the Order of regularisation.