Pallavi Lotlikar v. the Grievance Redressal Committee through Chairman, C/O Mumbai Divisional Board
Case brief
What is this about?
Bombay High Court writ petition disposed of as infructuous after Respondent No. 1 (State) passed and communicated the final order on the petitioner's complaint; original prayer was for a two-week direction to finalise the complaint; grievance redressal committee; Pallavi Lotlikar; no substantive ruling, no statutes or precedents discussed, no monetary amount involved.
What did the court decide?
Considering that the final order on the Complaint has been passed by Respondent No. 1, the present Petition has become infructuous. ¶24