Suryakumar Gaurishankarn Kanojia v. the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai, Mumbai, Head Office.
Case brief
What is this about?
Appearance-clause correction order; Bombay High Court; 08 January 2026; Coram G. S. Kulkarni & Aarti Sathe, JJ.; taken on board on praecipe of respondent/SRA speaking to minutes of order dated 23 December 2025; deletion and substitution of SRA counsel across enumerated writ petitions (including WP 3140/2019 Om Shri Sai Sra Co-op Housing Society; WP 2281/2021 Govind Dhondu Nakati & 74 Ors; WP 2072/2024 Nirmala Suresh Gaikwad; WP 2556/2024 Shambhunath Shivram Pandey; WP 3459/2025 Shivalik Ventures Pvt Ltd; numerous 2024-2025 petitions versus SRA/Chief Executive Officer SRA/State of Maharashtra); substituted counsel: Dr. Birendra Saraf, Senior Advocate with Vishwanath Patil, Ravleen Sabharwal and Aarushi Yadav for Respondents/SRA; corrected order made available to parties; no substantive holding.
What did the court decide?
Praecipe of the respondent/SRA acceded to: the appearance clause of the order dated 23 December 2025 is corrected by deleting the earlier recorded appearance for the respondent/SRA in the listed writ petitions and substituting Dr. Birendra Saraf, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vishwanath Patil, Ms. Ravleen Sabharwal and Ms. Aarushi Yadav for the Respondents/SRA; the corrected order is to be made available to the parties.