Disposed

Subodh Ramchandra Parte v. the State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC28 Jan 2026WP/301/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Withdrawal of criminal writ petition seeking quashing of FIR; FIR CR. No. 188 of 2025, Chitalsar Manpada Police Station; Sections 406, 408, 409, 420 read with 34 IPC, 1860; Article 226 Constitution of India; Section 482 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973; liberty to file discharge application before trial Court; disposal as withdrawn; Bombay High Court; Ashwin D. Bhobe, J.; 2026; Subodh Ramchandra P

What did the court decide?

Leave to withdraw the Petition with liberty to file an application seeking discharge before the trial Court at the appropriate stage; any such application to be considered on its own merits and in acc

Subodh Ramchandra Parte Vs the State of Maharashtra — Cheating and Forgery | Bombay HC (2026)

¶1

22- WP 301 of 2026.odt

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

VAISHALI ANIL TIKAM

¶4

Digitally signed by VAISHALI ANIL TIKAM Date: 2026.01.30 11:28:56 +0530

¶5

CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.301 OF 2026

¶6

Subodh Ramchandra Parte … Petitioner

¶7

V/s.

¶8

The State of Maharashtra … Respondent

¶9

Mr. Vaibhav P. Punekar i/b. Ms. Naseema F. Shaikh, Advocates for the Petitioner.

¶10

Mr. Prasanna P. Malshe, APP for the State.

¶11

CORAM : ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J. DATE : 28th JANUARY, 2026

¶12

P.C. :

¶13

1. By the present Petition, the Petitioner has sought for the following substantive relief:

¶14

"a) That this Hon'ble Court be pleased to issue a writ of certiorari or a Writ in the nature of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 thereby quashing and setting aside First Information Report being CR. No. 188 of 2025 (EXHIBIT-C hereto) registered with Respondent Police Station i.e. Chitalsar Manpada Police Station u/s. 406, 408, 409, 420 read with 34 IPC, 1860 on such terms and

¶15

¶16

Tikam

¶17

22- WP 301 of 2026.odt

¶18

conditions as this Hon'ble Court deem fit and proper."

¶19

After the matter was heard for some time, Mr. Vaibhav

¶20

Punekar, learned Advocate for the Petitioner, on instructions from the Petitioner, craves leave to withdraw the present Petition with liberty to file an application seeking discharge before the trial Court at the appropriate stage.

¶21

Request made by Mr. Vaibhav Punekar is not objected to by Mr. Malshe, learned APP for the State.

¶22

In view of the above, leave to withdraw the present Petition is granted with liberty to file an application seeking discharge before the trial Court at the appropriate stage. If such application is filed, the same be considered on its own merits and in accordance with law.

¶23

Writ Petition No. 301 of 2026 is disposed of as withdrawn.

¶24

(ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.)

¶25

¶26

Tikam

Subodh Ramchandra Parte v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Subodh Ramchandra Parte v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases