Rajendrasingh Narayansingh Rathod and Another v. State of Maha., Thr. Secy., Urban Development Dept., Mumbai and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition disposed of as infructuous; prayers in petition do not survive (joint statement of counsel); no adjudication of substantive grievances; liberty granted to petitioners (Rajendrasingh Narayansingh Rathod & Anr.) to file representation raising subsisting grievance before appropriate authority/Collector; authority/Collector to decide representation within eight weeks of receipt; State of Maharashtra & Ors. respondents; Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench; WP 2910/2024; 901.WP.2910.2024; 2026:BHC-NAG:3962-DB; Kilor & Wakode, JJ.; 10.03.2026; no costs; advocates T.D. Mandlekar, I.J. Damle (AGP), J.B. Kasat, N.P. Lambat.
What did the court decide?
Liberty to the petitioners to file a representation before the appropriate authority/Collector raising their subsisting grievance; the appropriate authority/Collector to decide such representation within eight weeks from the date of its receipt. No costs ordered.