Amitoj Inder Singh v. the National Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission, through Its Registrar

Bombay HC8 Jun 2026WP/2574/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bombay High Court; Writ Petition No.2574 of 2026; NCDRC; Consumer Case No.1280 of 2016; delay in disposal of consumer proceedings; 10-year pendency; case listed in final-hearing category since 2021; request to NCDRC to decide within 90 days; formal hearing within 30 days; final judgment within 60 days thereafter; petition disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Petition disposed of with a request to the NCDRC to decide Consumer Case No.1280 of 2016 within 90 days; a formal hearing to be conducted within 30 days and a final judgment endeavoured within 60 days thereafter. ¶¶22

Amitoj Inder Singh vs the National Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission, through Its Registrar — Bombay HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

904.WP-2574-2026.odt

¶2

Digitally signed by GAURI GAURI AMIT AMIT GAEKWAD GAEKWAD Date: 2026.06.10 10:42:51 +0530

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO.2574 OF 2026

¶5

Amitoj Inder Singh and Ors. ….Petitioners

¶6

Versus

¶7

The National Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission and Ors. ….Respondents

¶8

Mr. Ranjeev Carvalho a/w. Mr. Rishabh Murali, Ms. Nanki Garewal, Mr. Abhishek Ranjan and Ms. Sushmita Das i/b. Wadia Ghandy and Co. for the Petitioners.

¶9

Mr. Hasan Mushabber a/w. Ms. Rujuta Patil i/b. Negandhi Shah and Himayatullah for Respondent No.2.

¶10

CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, ACJ. &

¶11

GAUTAM A. ANKHAD, J.

¶12

DATE : 9^th JUNE, 2026

¶13

P.C. :-

¶14

Heard the learned Advocates for the respective sides.

¶15

The learned Advocate for the Petitioners submits that

¶16

the pending proceeding before the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC), lodged in 2016 and bearing Consumer Case No.1280 of 2016, has already been listed in the category of final hearing since 2021. There is no legal impediment for proceeding with the final hearing of the said matter.

1 of 2

Gauri Gaekwad

904.WP-2574-2026.odt

The learned Advocate for the contesting Respondent No.2 submits that he would not oppose a final hearing before the National Commission and there is no impediment in proceeding with the final hearing of the said matter.

¶21

In view of the above, and considering the passage of 10 years of the pendency of the proceedings before the National Commission, and keeping in view that the said case has already been listed in the category of final hearing in 2021, we would appreciate it if the NCDRC proceeds to deal with Consumer Case No.1280 of 2016 finally, within a period of 90 days, considering the fact that the Petitioners have already tendered their final written submissions in 2021 and Respondent No.2 has tendered its final written submissions in 2024. As such, a formal hearing may be conducted within 30 days from today and the NCDRC may endeavor to deliver a final judgment within 60 days thereafter.

¶22

With the above request, this Petition is disposed off .

¶23

(GAUTAM A. ANKHAD, J.) (ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE)

¶24

2 of 2

¶25

Gauri Gaekwad

Amitoj Inder Singh v. the National Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission, through Its Registrar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Amitoj Inder Singh v. the National Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission, through Its Registrar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Vivek Biyani vs State Bank of India

Ashni Biyani vs State Bank of India

M/S. Horizon Developers Thru. Partners vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Gulshan Arif Tase vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Union of India and Ors. vs Samir Vinod Yadav

Priti Rajesh Shah vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.