Disposed¶14

Pandu Kondiba Anwane Died L. R. Kisan Pandu Anwane Died L. R. and Others v. the State of Maharashtra through the District Collector Beed

Bombay HC17 Feb 2026WP/1715/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Execution petition delay; time-bound disposal directive; LARD 27 of 2018; Pandu Kondiba Anwane legal representatives; State of Maharashtra through District Collector Beed; Ad-hoc District Judge - 3 and Additional Sessions Judge Beed remarks lacking time frame; superior court fixing six-month deadline; Registrar (Judicial) circulation of order; writ petition disposed; Aurangabad bench 2026.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the Ad-hoc District Judge - 3 and Additional Sessions Judge, Beed to dispose of execution petition LARD 27 of 2018 (Pandu S/o Kondiba Anwane vs. State of Maharashtra) within six months; the learned Registrar (Judicial) to send a copy of the order to the concerned Court immediately. ¶14

Pandu Kondiba Anwane Died L. R. Kisan Pandu Anwane Died L. R. and Others vs the State of Maharashtra through the District Collector Beed — Bombay HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶14

Issue for consideration

Within how many days would the concerned Court decide the pending execution petition, and whether the Superior Court should fix a definite time frame for its disposal.

¶11

Ratio / Principle

The writ petition is disposed of by directing the learned Ad-hoc District Judge - 3 and Additional Sessions Judge, Beed to dispose of execution petition LARD 27 of 2018 (Pandu S/o Kondiba Anwane vs. State of Maharashtra) within a period of six months from the date of this order.

¶14

Key takeaways

The learned Registrar (Judicial) is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned Court immediately.ratio¶14
When the Superior Court asks for a specific time frame, at least care ought to be taken by the concerned Judge to state the time frame; merely undertaking to dispose of the case as early as possible is not sufficient.obiter¶11

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Writ Petition No. 1715 of 2026, High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench (per curiam: Smt. Vibha Kankanwadi and Ajit B. Kadethankar, JJ.; 29.04.2026). Pursuant to the Court's order dated 26.03.2026, a report was received from the Ad-hoc District Judge - 3 and Additional Sessions Judge, Beed on the time frame for deciding the pending execution petition LARD 27 of 2018 (Pandu S/o Kondiba Anwane vs. State of Maharashtra); the report stated no time frame, offering only that the Judge would try to dispose of the case as early as possible. Finding this insufficient, and expressing strong dissatisfaction with the manner in which the remarks were given, the Court disposed of the writ petition by directing the said Judge to dispose of LARD 27 of 2018 within six months, and directed the learned Registrar (Judicial) to send a copy of the order to the concerned Court immediately.

Pandu Kondiba Anwane Died L. R. Kisan Pandu Anwane Died L. R. and Others v. the State of Maharashtra through the District Collector Beed

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pandu Kondiba Anwane Died L. R. Kisan Pandu Anwane Died L. R. and Others v. the State of Maharashtra through the District Collector Beed

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Anil Ganjidhar Pawar vs A.S. Ahire Custodian Dhule Zilla Parishad Employees Co. Operative Housing Society Ltd. and Another

Anil Ganjidhar Pawar vs A.S. Ahire Custodian Dhule Zilla Parishad Employees Co. Operative Housing Society Ltd. and Another

Ashwini Shrikant Rahane vs Shrikant Ramnath Rahane

Dr Sanjay Kacharu Pawar vs the State of Maharashtra

Vijay Rajeshwar Niture and Others vs Uday Sahakari Grah Nirman Sanstha Maryadit Udgir through Its Authorized Member

Uday Sahakari Grah Nirman Sanstha Maryadit Udgir through Its Authorized Member vs State of Maharashtra through the Secretary and Others