Dismissed¶27
Bharatratna Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Magasvargiya Krushi Prakriya Sahkari Sanstha Ltd. v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Bombay HCWP/15909/2024
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Bombay High Court writ petition dismissed in limine for non-prosecution; advocate's palpably false statement about rejoinder leave; at least three adjournment-only appearances; rejoinder unfiled since order dated 17 November 2025; refusal to pay reasonable cost for adjournment; bickering with the Court; petitioner held not serious enough; no statute or precedent cited; no substantive issue decided; no costs imposed; respondents include State of Maharashtra; Omkar Chavan (h/f Nitin Gaware Patil) for petitioner; Kavita N. Solunke (Addl.G.P.) and V.G. Badgujar (A.G.P.) for Respondent-State.
What did the court decide?
The petitioner's advocate made a palpably false statement before the Court that, on the last occasion, the Court had permitted him to file a rejoinder. ¶17