Disposed¶17
Sherry Sarosh Doodhmal v. Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority Throu. Its Vice President and Ors.
Bombay HCWP/158/2026
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Withdrawal of writ petition at threshold; petitioner Sherry Sarosh Doodhmal; respondents Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority (MHADA) & Ors., respondent no. 3 and the State; dispute with developer; remedies expressly kept open including contentions of respondent/developer and MHADA; Bombay High Court, Civil Appellate Jurisdiction; bench G. S. Kulkarni & Aarti Sathe; decided 3 February 2026; disposed as withdrawn; no merits adjudicated; no statute or precedent cited.
What did the court decide?
Leave to withdraw the writ petition granted; all other remedies available to the petitioner in the event of any dispute with the developer expressly kept open, including the contentions of the respondent/developer and of MHADA. ¶17