Kontabai Vishwanath Mahanvar and Others v. Seeta Nana Shinde and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Paucity-of-time adjournment order, Bombay High Court Aurangabad Bench, S.G. Chapalgaonkar J., 02.02.2026. Batch adjournment of numerous writ petitions (e.g. WP/874/2025, WP/1455/2024, WP/11326/2024 ... up to WP/83/2026, WP/263/2026, WP/398/2026) to dates 25.03.2026, 30.03.2026, 01.04.2026, 06.04.2026, 07.04.2026 and 08.04.2026. Interim relief/undertaking/statement to continue till next date. AGPs for Respondent State: A.S. Mantri, Vivek Lomte, K.B. Jadhavar, S.A. Gaikwad, S.R. Yadav-Lonikar, S.N. Kendre, M.K. Goyanka, K.N. Lokhande, S.D. Ghayal. No statutory provisions, precedents, issues or substantive holdings.
What did the court decide?
Matters adjourned due to paucity of time; interim relief/undertaking/statement, if any, in the listed matters shall continue till the next date. ¶7