Disposed¶25

M/S. Sharda Enterprises, Thr. Its Proprietor Mr. Nitis Premnath Jaiswal Nagpur v. State of Maha., Thr. Additional Chief Secy. Finance Dept., Mumbai and Ors.

Bombay HC13 Feb 2026WP/1416/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Sharda Enterprises; State of Maharashtra; Nagpur Bench; writ petition; blocking of electronic credit ledger; compensation for losses; corrective steps; Rawman Metal & Alloys v. Deputy Commissioner of State Tax, Thane; Writ Petition (L) No. 10928/2025 decided 07.10.2025; A.G.P.; interim directions; matter listed 27/3/2026.

What did the court decide?

Interim direction: the learned A.G.P. and counsel for respondent no.4 were directed to go through the aforesaid judgment (Rawman Metal & Alloys) and to instruct the respondents to take corrective steps if the issue involved in the petition is indeed covered by that judgment. ¶20

M/S. Sharda Enterprises, Thr. Its Proprietor Mr. Nitis Premnath Jaiswal Nagpur vs State of Maha., Thr. Additional Chief Secy. Finance Dept., Mumbai and Ors. — Bombay HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Disposed

¶25

Issue for consideration

Whether the issue raised in the petition - losses suffered by the petitioner because of blocking of its electronic credit ledger - is covered by this Court's judgment in Rawman Metal & Alloys v. The Deputy Commissioner of State Tax, Thane, such that the respondents should take corrective steps and, failing that, whether the petitioner should be compensated.

¶16

Court's answer

¶20

Key takeaways

Conditional indication: failing corrective steps by the respondents (where the issue is covered by the Rawman Metal & Alloys judgment), the Court may consider compensating the petitioner for the losses it suffered because of blocking of its electronic credit ledger. Prospective and conditional; no compensation determined.obiter¶24

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench - Writ Petition No. 1416 of 2026 (M/s. Sharda Enterprises, through its Proprietor Mr. Nitis Premnath Jaiswal v. State of Maharashtra & Ors.) - Coram: Anil L. Pansare and Nivedita P. Mehta, JJ. - Order dated February 20, 2026 (interim). The petitioner's grievance concerns losses allegedly suffered because of blocking of its electronic credit ledger. Counsel for the petitioner had submitted (order dated 13/2/2026) that the issue is covered by this Court's judgment in Rawman Metal & Alloys v. The Deputy Commissioner of State Tax, Thane, [Writ Petition (L) No. 10928/2025, decided on 07.10.2025]. On 20.02.2026 the Court granted time to counsel for respondent no.4 and directed the learned A.G.P. and respondent no.4's counsel to go through that judgment and instruct the respondents to take corrective steps if the issue involved is indeed covered, failing which the Court may consider compensating the petitioner for the losses suffered because of blocking of the electronic credit ledger. Matter listed on 27/3/2026. No statute or section cited; no quantum assessed; no final adjudication.

M/S. Sharda Enterprises, Thr. Its Proprietor Mr. Nitis Premnath Jaiswal Nagpur v. State of Maha., Thr. Additional Chief Secy. Finance Dept., Mumbai and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S. Sharda Enterprises, Thr. Its Proprietor Mr. Nitis Premnath Jaiswal Nagpur v. State of Maha., Thr. Additional Chief Secy. Finance Dept., Mumbai and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Shobha W/O Vishwanth Bansod vs the State of Mah. Thr. Pso, Pso, Gadge Nagar Tq. and Dist. Amravati and Another.

Zamkhankap S/O Thangzachin vs the State of Maharashtra Thr Its Sub Divisional Forest Office Rajura Dist Chandrapur

Shri. Amar S/O Omveersingh Rathi vs the State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary Home Department Mantralaya Mumbai and 3 Others

Rahul S/O Bandu Bagde vs the State of Maha., Thr. Secretary, Tribal Development Dept., Mumbai and Ors.

M/S. G.H. Khandelwal, Thr. Partner, Ankur S/O. Rupchand Khandelwal vs Amravati Municipal Corporation, Thr. Its Commissioner, Amravati and Ors.

M/S. Sharda Enterprises, Thr. Its Proprietor Mr. Nitis Premnath Jaiswal Nagpur vs State of Maha., Thr. Additional Chief Secy. Finance Dept., Mumbai and Ors.