Disposed

Uflex Ltd. Thr. Siddharth Supervisor (Legal) v. D.R. Coats Ink and Resins Pvt. Ltd.

Bombay HC13 Jan 2026WP/12611/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bombay High Court, Civil Appellate Jurisdiction; Writ Petition No. 12611 of 2025; Uflex Ltd (petitioner) v. D.R. Coats Ink And Resins Pvt Ltd (respondent); decided 14 January 2026 by N.J. Jamadar, J. Consent disposal of challenge to rejection of application for return of plaint in Summary Suit No. 13/2021 (Civil Judge, Senior Division, Palghar); suit transferred to City Civil Court, Dindoshi, Mumb

What did the court decide?

On consent minutes, Summary Suit No. 13/2021 transferred from the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Palghar to the City Civil Court at Dindoshi, Mumbai; ad-interim relief of 25 July 2024 vacated; transfer

Uflex Ltd. Thr. Siddharth Supervisor (Legal) vs D.R. Coats Ink and Resins Pvt. Ltd. — Bombay HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

909 WP 12611-25.DOC

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

WRIT PETITION NO. 12611 OF 2025

¶4

Uflex Ltd Thr. Siddharth Supervisor (Legal)

¶5

..Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

D.R. Coats Ink And Resins Pvt Ltd. …Respondent

¶8

Mr. Aadil Parsurampuria a/w Mr. Aalam Parsurampuria i/by Mr. Prashant Parsurampuriya, for the Petitioner.

¶9

Mr. Manoj G. Agre i/by Mr. Girish B. Kedia, for the Respondent.

¶10

CORAM: N. J. JAMADAR, J. DATE : 14^th JANUARY 2026

¶11

ORDER:

¶12

Heard the learned Counsel for the parties.

¶13

The learned Counsel for the parties submit that, the

¶14

parties have arrived at an amicable resolution of the dispute and minutes of the order have been drawn.

¶15

Digitally signed SANTOSHSUBHASH by SANTOSHSUBHASHKULKARNI KULKARNI Date: 2026.01.1710:52:09 +0530

¶16

The learned Counsel for the parties seeks leave to tender

¶17

minutes of the order.

¶18

Leave granted.

¶19

The minutes of the order are taken on record and marked

¶20

‘X’ which read as under:-.

¶21

1/3

¶22

SAINATH

¶23

909 WP 12611-25.DOC

¶24

“1. Petitioner has filed the present petition

¶25

challenging order dated 21^st June, 2023 rejecting their application for return of plaint in Summary Suit No. 13/2021 pending before the Court of Senior Division, Civil Judge at Palghar, Maharashtra. After arguing the matter for some time, both sides agree that Summary Suit No. 13 of 2021 pending before Civil Judge, Senior Division, Palghar can be transferred to the City Civil Court at Dindoshi, Mumbai.”

¶26

In view of the aforesaid minutes of the order, the Summary Suit No. 13/2021, pending on the file of learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, Palghar stands transferred to the City Civil Court at Dindoshi for hearing and disposal in accordance with law.

¶27

The ad-interim relief granted by this Court by order dated 25^th July, 2024 stands vacated.

¶28

The learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, Palghar is requested to transfer the record and proceeding in Summary Suit No. 13/2021 to the City Civil Court at Dindoshi, Mumbai with such dispatch that, it reaches the City Civil Court within a SAINATH 2/3

¶29

909 WP 12611-25.DOC

¶30

period of four weeks from the date of communication of this order.

¶31

The suit stands transferred to the City Civil court at Dindoshi without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the parties on the merits of the matter. However, the parties shall not be entitled to again agitate the point of jurisdictional competence of City Civil Court at Dindoshi to entertain, try and decide the transferred suit (Summary Suit No. 13/2021).

¶32

Upon transfer, the learned Judge, City Civil Court, Dindoshi, is requested to hear and decide the suit as expeditiously as possible.

¶33

The petition thus stands disposed.

¶34

3/3

¶35

SAINATH

Uflex Ltd. Thr. Siddharth Supervisor (Legal) v. D.R. Coats Ink and Resins Pvt. Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Uflex Ltd. Thr. Siddharth Supervisor (Legal) v. D.R. Coats Ink and Resins Pvt. Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Ajaykumar S Yadav and Ors. vs the State of Maharashtra Throu. Govt Pleader

M/S Sumit Properties Throu. Partners vs State of Maharashtra Throu. the Principal Sec. Ministry of Cooperation and Marketing and Ors.

Usha Lal Gulabani vs Niraj Kakad Developers LLP and Ors.

Datta Khandu Atakari vs Dhondibhau Ranu Mhaske Decd.Thr Heirs and Legal Representive and Ors.

Sampat Vishnu Bandal vs Dinkar Bhiku Bardade and Others

Shiakh Asif Shaikh Rashid @ Asif Shaikh Rasheed vs Mufti Mohammad Ismail Abdul Khalique