Disposed¶8

Firoz Nisar Shaikh v. the Divisional Commissioner, Pune

Bombay HC17 Mar 2026WP/1202/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bombay High Court common order dated 22-04-2026 (Ghuge & Venegavkar, JJ.): batch listing order — interim orders to continue; office objections to be removed within two weeks; spare copies within 14 days failing which dismissal against unserved respondents on the 15th day; listing schedule from 15/06/2026 (Disposal) to 16/07/2026 (Final Hearing). No merits decided; no statutes or precedents cited.

What did the court decide?

Ad-interim/interim orders, if any granted earlier, to continue subject to removal of office objections within two weeks; matters listed batch-wise on scheduled dates from 15/06/2026 to 16/07/2026. ¶8

Firoz Nisar Shaikh vs the Divisional Commissioner, Pune — Bombay HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

Common Order Dated 22-04-2026.odt

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION/ CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE & HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, JJ.

¶4

DATE : 22^nd APRIL, 2026.

¶5

P.C. :-

¶6

At the time of rising, the matters mentioned in the chart in paragraph No. 7 hereunder, could not be taken up for hearing due to paucity of time.

¶7

In several of these matters, there are office objections. As such, all office objections shall be removed within two weeks.

¶8

Subject to compliance of the above, ad-interim/ interim order, if any granted earlier, would continue.

¶9

The affidavit in reply/rejoinder, if any, shall also be filed at least one week before the next date.

¶10

Matters in which service of notice is awaited, put up after service.

¶11

Matters in which though notices were issued, the office could not process the notice due to non-supply of spare copies, the Petitioner shall supply spare copies for issuance of notice within 14 days, failing which, the matters in which copies are not supplied, would stand dismissed as against the unserved Respondents on the 15^th day. If copies are supplied, office to issue notice to the unserved Respondents, returnable after four weeks.

¶12

Subject to the above, list these matters as under:-

¶13

1 of 2

¶14

Sonali

¶15

Common Order Dated 22-04-2026.odt

¶16

Serial Nos. of matters on the Board	To be listed on	To be listed in the category
03 to 05	15/06/2026	Disposal
06 to 30	16/06/2026	Fresh Admission
31 to 66	17/06/2026	Fresh Admission
68 to 71	18/06/2026	Fresh Admission
72	18/06/2026	For Admission
73 to 76	19/06/2026	Urgent Admission
77 to 83	19/06/2026	Urgent Order
84 to 100	13/07/2026	Due Admission
101 to 120	13/07/2026	Due Admission
121 to 140	14/07/2026	Due Admission
141 to 160	14/07/2026	Due Admission
161 to 168	15/07/2026	Due Admission
169	15/07/2026	Due Admission
170 to 172	16/07/2026	Final Hearing

¶17

(HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, J.) (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.)

¶18

Digitally signed by SONALI SONALI MILIND MILIND PATIL PATIL Date: 2026.04.23 11:14:57 +0530

¶19

2 of 2

¶20

Sonali

Firoz Nisar Shaikh v. the Divisional Commissioner, Pune

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Firoz Nisar Shaikh v. the Divisional Commissioner, Pune

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Procedural history

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Breach Candy Hospital Trust vs Additional Joint Commissioner of Incom Tax

Dinesh Raju Shetty vs State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Caroset Technology Pvt. Ltd. vs Cyber Crime Police Station of Verious States and Ors.

Dinesh Raju Shetty vs State of Maharashtra and Anr.

The Anglo Scottish Education Society vs the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions)

Chetan Ramesh Gomta vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.