Dismissed¶117
Anil Ganjidhar Pawar v. Satish Atramam Patil and Others
Bombay HCWP/11409/2025
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Dismissal for want of prosecution; batch of 25 writ petitions; Anil Ganjidhar Pawar (party-in-person petitioner) repeatedly absent despite last-chance postings; Bombay High Court Aurangabad Bench; S. G. Chapalgaonkar, J.; K. B. Jadhavar AGP for Respondent/State; no merits adjudicated, no statutory or precedent discussion.
What did the court decide?
Despite adjournment on request and postings by way of last chance, the party-in-person petitioner remained absent when the matters were called out, and the court concluded that he had no interest in prosecuting the Writ Petitions. ¶111