Dismissed¶20

Lvg Facility India Pvt. Ltd. v. Pune Municipal Corporation Thr Its Municipal Commissioner and Ors.

Bombay HC13 Feb 2026WP/11027/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bombay High Court, Writ Petition No.11027 of 2025, LVG Facility India Pvt. Ltd. v. Pune Municipal Corporation & Ors., Coram: Shree Chandrashekhar, CJ. and Gautam A. Ankhad, J., decided 26 March 2026. Article 226 challenge to bidder's disqualification dated 2 July 2025 in tender Ref. No.PMC/HEALTH/NUHM/01/2025-26; petition dismissed as withdrawn on petitioner's letter dated 2 February 2026 expressing unwillingness to continue. No merits adjudication and no precedent value on tender disqualification; relevant only as an instance of withdrawal of a tender-disqualification writ petition.

What did the court decide?

None on merits; the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn at the petitioner's request (permission to withdraw granted). ¶20

Lvg Facility India Pvt. Ltd. vs Pune Municipal… — Writ and Judicial Review | Bombay HC (2026)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶2

WRIT PETITION NO.11027 OF 2025

¶3

LVG Facility India Pvt. Ltd. .. Petitioner Vs. Pune Municipal Corporation, Pune and Ors. .. Respondents

¶4

Ms. Pradnya C. Solanki with Mr. Radhikesh V. Uttarwar and Ms. Pooja R. Thakur, Advocates for the Petitioner.

¶5

Mr. Rushikesh M. Pethe, Advocate for Respondent Nos.1 to 4.

¶6

CORAM : SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR, CJ. & GAUTAM A. ANKHAD, J.

¶7

DATE : 26^TH MARCH 2026.

¶8

P.C. :

¶9

By this writ petition, the petitioner prays for the following reliefs:

¶10

“a. The Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue appropriate writ, order or directions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India; thereby directing the respondent-Pune Municipal Corporation and tender issuing authority to set aside the disqualification of the petitioner passed on 2^nd July 2025 and uploaded on 30^th July 2025 in the tender process bearing Tender Ref. No.PMC/HEALTH/NUHM/01/2025-26;

¶11

b. The Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue appropriate writ, order or directions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India; thereby directing the respondent-Corporation and tender issuing authority to open the financial bid of the petitioner with respect to tender process bearing Tender Ref. No.PMC/HEALTH/NUHM/01/2025-26;

¶12

c. Pending hearing and final disposal of the present petition, the tender process of the tender bearing Tender Ref. No.PMC/HEALTH/NUHM/01/2025-26 may kindly be stayed;

¶13

d. Ad-interim relief in terms of prayer clause (c) above may kindly be granted;

¶14

e. The Hon’ble Court may further be pleased to award costs in favour of the petitioner, including but not limited to legal expenses, court fees and any other incidental costs incurred in pursuing this petition as this Hon’ble Court deems fit.”

¶15

1/2

¶16

901-WP-11027-2025.doc

¶17

Dixit

¶18

Ms. Pradnya C. Solanki, learned counsel for the Petitioner tenders a letter dated 2^nd February 2026 received from the petitioner-Company expressing its unwillingness to continue with this petition and further instructing the counsel to unconditionally withdraw this writ petition. The learned counsel accordingly seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition.

¶19

The letter dated 2^nd February 2026 is taken on record and marked “X” for identification.

¶20

Writ Petition No.11027 of 2025 is dismissed as withdrawn.

¶21

[ GAUTAM A. ANKHAD, J. ]

¶22

[ CHIEF JUSTICE ]

¶23

Digitally signed by SNEHA SNEHAABHAY ABHAY DIXIT 901-WP-11027-2025.doc DIXIT Date:2026.03.27 14:55:44 +0530

¶24

2/2

¶25

Dixit

Lvg Facility India Pvt. Ltd. v. Pune Municipal Corporation Thr Its Municipal Commissioner and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Lvg Facility India Pvt. Ltd. v. Pune Municipal Corporation Thr Its Municipal Commissioner and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Trishta Bharat Vardhan and Anr. vs Champalal K. Vardhan and 35 Ors.

Hero Devi and vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.

M/S Artworld Desingers Thro. Its Proprietor Ramesh L. Thombre vs the State of Maharashtra Thro. Its Chief Secretary

Shaikh Mohd Salim Mohd Siddique vs State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Bhausaheb Sukdeo Gaikwad and Anr. vs State of Maharashtra Thr the Principal Secretary and Ors.

Bhausaheb Sukdeo Gaikwad and Anr. vs State of Maharashtra Thr the Principal Secretary and Ors.