Shri Chintamani Mahila Education Society Pimple Bk v. the State of Maharashtra through the Secretary and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Paucity-of-time bulk adjournment order, Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court, dated 23-01-2026; coram Smt. Vibha Kankanwadi & Hiten S. Venegavkar, JJ.; interim relief/undertakings/statements continued till next date; matters rescheduled to 16.04.2026-23.04.2026; covers writ petitions from 2021-2025, PIL No. 55 of 2024, Criminal PIL No. 12 of 2020, Family Court Appeals from 2009 and 2025, civil applications, and Income Tax Appeals Nos. 43 and 79 of 2016. Purely procedural scheduling order; no ruling on merits, no statutes cited, no precedents cited, no parties or advocates named ('Appearances as per board').
What did the court decide?
Bulk administrative adjournment: the scheduled matters (numerous writ petitions, public interest litigations, criminal public interest litigation, family court appeals, civil applications and income tax appeals) are carried forward to next dates ranging from 16.04.2026 to 23.04.2026, with any existing interim relief / undertaking / statement continuing till the next date.