Allowed

Bina Pravin Rao v. Malti Bhagwan Lavingia

Bombay HC2 Feb 2026TP/5925/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petition for Letters of Administration (de bonis non) over properties left unadministered after the earlier grant holder died. With citation expired and no objection or caveat, the court granted the administration to the petitioner for the scheduled properties.

What did the court decide?

Letters of Administration (De-Bonis-non) granted to petitioner for scheduled properties, effective throughout Maharashtra; account to be filed per oath.

Bina Pravin Rao vs Malti Bhagwan Lavingia — Succession and Inheritance | Bombay HC (2026)

¶1

2 68.TP/5925/2025

¶2

Before: Shri. P. A. Jagdale, Officer on Special Duty, With the Testamentary Department Date 18th February, 2026

¶3

FOR COMPLIANCE:

¶4

TP/5925/2025 ) Ms. Kajal Naidu i/b Thodur Law Associates Ld. ) (AMH20240131888C2025000 Advocate for the Petitioner ) 09)

¶5

P.C.:

¶6

Petitioner, namely Bina Pravin Rao nee Bina Pravinkumar Rao nee Bina P. Rao nee B. P. Rao nee Bina Bhagwandas Lavingia, nee Bina Bhagwan Lavingia nee Bina B. Lavingia nee Beena Bhagwan Lavingia, has applied for the grant of Letters of Administration(De-bonis non), under the provisions of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (for short “IS Act”), for the properties left by the deceased, namely Malti Bhagwan Lavingia nee Malti Bhagwandas Lavingia nee Malti B. Lavingia, nee Malati Bhagwandas Lavingia(For short “Said deceased”). A daughter of the deceased Shruti Lavingia has filed a petition no. 2247/2018 and this Court has issued the grant of Letters of Administration. However, later on said administrator died leaving certain properties unadministered. Hence, this petition is filed for Letters of Administration (De-bonis-non).

¶7

I have heard Ld. Advocate. I perused the documents, such as a true copy of the death certificate of the deceased, an identity proof of the deceased, an oath in the prescribed format, affidavit of service citation.

¶8

Said deceased died as a Widow on 25-07-2006 at Mumbai leaving behind her legal heirs, shown in the paragraph No. 6 of the petition. Petitioner states that there are no other legal heirs to the deceased, except heirs shown in the petition. The deceased left properties shown in Schedule I of the petition. The delay has been explained vide Rule 382 of the Rules.

¶9

Office issued Citation to all concern and same has been affixed on the Notice Board of the Hon’ble High Court and notice board of the Collector’s Office at Mumbai and 14 days have been expired vide Rule 397(1) and (4) of the Bombay High Court(O.S.) Rules, 1980(for short “BHC Rules”). An affidavit to that effect has been filed. Notice to the collector has been issued vide Rule 396 of the BHC Rules. Till today, no one has appeared to resist the claim of the petitioner, nor has anything

¶10

2 68.TP/5925/2025

¶11

been brought to the notice regarding pending litigation about the same properties. Hence, the petition is treated as an uncontested one.

¶12

Properties which are belonging to the deceased found subsequently and which are not part of the earlier grant. However, in view of order dated 30.01.2024 passed in TP/908/2023 these properties are required to be treated as a unadministered properties of the deceased.

¶13

In view of the order passed by the Hon’ble Court in TP Nos. 2556 & 2559 of 2022 dated 28.02.2023 and in TP/2918/2023, the petitioner, being the sole heir of the deceased, is exempted from furnishing the administrative bond.

¶14

Ld. Advocate for the petitioner submitted that in view of provisions of The Hindu Succession Act, 1956, the petitioner, being daughter of the deceased, is entitled to seek a Letters of Administration. Hence, facts stated by the petitioner, on oath, remained unchallenged and required to be accepted. Accordingly, the petition deserves to be allowed, as prayed for. Hence, following order:

¶15

ORDER

¶16

1. Petition is allowed and the Letters of Administration (De-Bonis-non) be granted to the petitioner for properties, left by the deceased and shown in the schedule, in the prescribed format, having effect throughout the State of Maharashtra as per the provisions of the Indian Succession Act, 1925.

¶17

1. The petitioner to file an account as undertaken in a Petitioner’s Oath within the stipulated period.

¶18

1. Before issuance of the grant, the office to verify that there is no cross-petition pending or caveat resisting the petition is filed.

¶19

18th February, 2026

¶20

Officer on Special Duty, with the Testamentary Department

Bina Pravin Rao v. Malti Bhagwan Lavingia

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bina Pravin Rao v. Malti Bhagwan Lavingia

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Roshan Lavu Gurav vs Late Jagannath Gopal Gurav alias J G Gurav

Venugopal Umanath Balwalli vs Shyamala Umanath Baiwalli Deceased

Zee Learn Limited vs Jakhar Educational and Welfare Society

Dipali Sameer Karpe vs Vasant Baburao Mohite Decased

Rekha Deepak Digaskar vs Deepak Dwarkanath Digaskar

Prachi Avinash Riswadkar vs Rekha Bhalchandra Thakurdesai Decased