Mohan Raghunath Agashe vs Sadashiv Raghunath Agashe

¶1

2 93.TP/50/2026

¶2

Before: Shri. P. A. Jagdale, Officer on Special Duty, With the Testamentary Department Date: 26th March 2026

¶3

FOR COMPLIANCE:

¶4

TP/50/2026 ) Ms. Shivangi Mukharjee i/b M G Legal Ld. (AMH20250006142C202500022) ) Advocate for the Petitioner with ) WILL/26/2026

¶5

P.C.:

¶6

1) Petitioner, namely MOHAN RAGHUNATH AGASHE, filed this petition for grant of Letters of Administration with Will Annexed, being the one of the legatees under the Will executed by SADASHIV RAGHLINATH AGASHE (herein after the same is referred to as “Testator”), for the grant of a Letters of Administration with Will annexed. The Said Testator said to have died at Mumbai on 17.06.2025.

¶7

2) Perused petition. Heard Ld. Advocate for the petitioner. Perused documents. Petitioner, filed the copy of death certificate, an identity proof of the testator, Will and petitioner's oath.

¶8

3) No executor has been appointed under the Will. The petitioner is the one of the beneficiary under the Will. Hence, the petition is tenable.

¶9

4) Petitioner stated that the deceased left behind his last Will and Testament, which was duly executed at Pune on 25.12.2024, in English language. The Will is handed over separately for being filed and kept in a safe place in the Office of the Prothonotary and Senior Master, High Court, Bombay.

¶10

5) Ld. Advocate for the petitioner submits that the testator died as bachelor and his parents were predeceased to him. The deceased is survived by Petitioner(brother) and Prabhakar Raghunath Aghashe (brother), as his legal heirs, whose details are given in the petition’s paragraph No. 09,as per the provisions of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956. The petitioner affirmed that there are no other legal heirs of the deceased, except as mentioned in the petition. Legal heir of the testator has consented to the petition and thereby waived the service of Citation.

¶11

6) Citation to all Concern was issued and same has been duly affixed on the conspicuous part of the Hon’ble High Court and notice board of the Collector’s Office at Mumbai and 14 days have been expired vide Rule 397(1) and (4) of the Bombay High Court (O.S.) Rules, 1980(for short “BHC Rules”) and an affidavit to that effect has been filed. Notice to collector has been issued vide Rule 396 of BHC Rules. Till today, no one appeared to resist the claim of the petitioner or nothing is brought to the notice regarding pending litigation

¶12

2 93.TP/50/2026

¶13

pertaining to the same properties. Hence, the petition is treated as uncontested one.

¶14

7) The petitioner has filed the affidavit of Rajashree Anil Kolhatkar one of attesting Witnesses to the Will, in form No.102 of Bombay High Court (Original Side) Rules, 1980. She deposed that deceased signed the Testament in her presence and the testator was in sound state of mind at the time of execution of the Will. Hence, enough evidence is on record to accept the execution of the Will and petitioner is succeeded to prove the execution of Will. According to her all additions and alteration in a Will were existed at the time of execution before signing the Will. Hence, there is sufficient compliance of the Rule 383 of the Rules.

¶15

8) Properties mentioned in the schedule-I of the petition are referred in the Will. Other legatee, namely Prasad Prabhakar Agashe, has given consent to grant Letters of Administration to petitioner. Petitioner has executed the administration Bond in the prescribed format. Hence, following order:

¶16

ORDER

¶17

1) Petition is granted.

¶18

2) Office to issue Letters of Administration with Will annexed to the petitioner, as per the Rules, having effect throughout the State of Maharashtra.

¶19

3) Before issuance of Letters of Administration with Will, the office to verify that there is no cross Petition is pending or caveat is filed. Office to act accordingly.

¶20

26th March 2026 Officer on Special Duty, with Testamentary Department

Mohan Raghunath Agashe v. Sadashiv Raghunath Agashe

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohan Raghunath Agashe v. Sadashiv Raghunath Agashe

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

The New Green Chambers Co-Operative Housing Society Limited, through Its Chairman Abdul H Shaikh vs the Chief Officer, Mbr and R Board ( a Mhada Unit)

Salubai Maruti Gawde vs Maruti Genu Gawde alias Maruti Genu Gawde alias Maruti Genu Gavde alias Maruti ganu Gavde

Mayuri Lalit Thakkar alias Mayuri Lalit Popat vs Kanakalata Visanji Katira

Claudine Camilo Geraldo Pereira vs Camilo Geraldo Assis Pereira Deceased

Jyoti Vinayak Mete vs Vinayak Tukaram Mete Since Deceased

Giri Gagan Khorana son of Manmohan Khorana vs Manmohan Khorana alias Manmohan Khorana son of Jaganath Khorana alias (Deceased)