Allowed¶11

Sonal Dipak Sanghani v. Chandrakant Rasiklal Sanghani

Probate – Testamentary Petition TP/43/2026

Bombay HC6 Jan 2026TP/43/2026

Download

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Grant of probate to executrix Sonal Dipak Sanghani under the Will dated 22.06.2015 of Chandrakant Rasiklal Sanghani (deceased 13.08.2018, Mumbai); attesting witness affidavit of Bindu Nishit Shah (17.12.2025); consent affidavits of all other legal heirs; service of general citation (20.01.2026); delay condoned; legal formalities complied with; probate ordered to be issued subject to check for cross petition or caveat; order by Company Registrar / Testamentary Registrar Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar dated 13.03.2026.

What did the court decide?

Probate of the last Will and Testament of the deceased granted to the petitioner-executrix; Office to issue probate as prayed after verifying that no cross petition or caveat is filed. ¶11

Sonal Dipak Sanghani vs Chandrakant Rasiklal Sanghani — Bombay HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

SLG

¶2

BEFORE : MRS. KAVITA Y. AMBEKAR , COMPANY REGISTRAR / TESTAMENTARY REGISTRAR Date: 13^th March, 2026

¶3

CALLED FOR HEARING :

¶4

12 TP/43/2026 (E-filing) WITH

¶5

WILL/22/2026

¶6

Ms. Jyoti Badgujar i/b. Lakdawala and Co., Advocate for petitioner

¶7

PC : 1. Perused Petition. Heard Ld. Advocate for petitioner. This petition is for Probate of last Will and Testament of deceased filed by petitioner namely Sonal Dipak Sanghani being Executrix named under the Will of deceased. The deceased namely Chandrakant Rasiklal Sanghani died at Mumbai on 13.08.2018. Copy of death certificate is annexed to the petition. Identification proof of deceased viz. copy of Aadhaar Card is annexed to the petition.

¶8

The deceased left behind his last Will and Testament which was duly executed at Mumbai on 22.06.2015. The said Will is in English language. The Para No.6 of the Will refers to the appointment of Executrix. Only one Executrix appointed under the Will who is petitioner herein. Residuary clause in respect of properties of deceased is mentioned at para No. 4 of the Will.

¶9

Ld. Advocate for petitioner submits that parents and wife of deceased predeceased the deceased. One daughter of deceased namely Renuka died as spinster. One son of deceased namely Dipak died leaving behind his widow, one son and one daughter. Deceased was survived by two daughter, one daughter-inlaw, one grandson and one granddaughter. Out of them daughter-in-law is petitioner herein and all other legal heirs have given their consents in favour of the petitioner herein. Consent Affidavits are on record. There are no other legal heirs.

¶10

Petitioner's oath is filed. Affidavit of Bindu Nishit Shah dated 17.12.2025 one of the Attesting Witness to the Will is filed. Affidavit of Service of General Citation dated 20.01.2026 is filed. Delay is explained and the same is condoned. All other legal formalities are complied with. Hence, petition is granted.

¶11

Office to issue Probate as prayed after verifying whether any cross petition is filed or whether any caveat is filed.

¶12

COMPANY REGISTRAR /

¶13

TESTAMENTARY REGISTRAR

¶14

13.03.2026

Sonal Dipak Sanghani v. Chandrakant Rasiklal Sanghani

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sonal Dipak Sanghani v. Chandrakant Rasiklal Sanghani

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Shishir Jitendra Dhebar vs Narendra Badrishankar Dhebar

Sneheet Shashank Sawant vs Vinata Bhaskar Sawant alias Vinta Bhaskar Sawant alias Vinita Bhaskar Sawant

Rajeshri Wamanrao Dhote vs Chandrajit Atmaram Ranavde alias Chandrajit Ranavde alias Chandrajit a Ranavde

Mahesh Gobindram Narang vs Late Arjun Hundraj Dadlani Alias Late Arjan Hundraj Dadlanim (Deceased)

Shonan Dhaval Wagh vs Late Vijay Chandrakant Katvi

Vishwas Anant Joshi vs Anant Raghunath Joshi