Disposed¶3

Dnyanoba @Dnyaneshwar Maroti Bembade v. Archana W/O Dnyanoba @Dnyaneshwar Maroti Bembade

Bombay HC29 Jan 2026SA/404/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

BHC Aurangabad bench; SECOND APPEAL / SA NO. 404 OF 2024; Dnyanoba @ Dnyaneshwar Maroti Bembade v. Archana W/o Dnyanoba @ Dnyaneshwar Maroti Bembade; Mehroz K. Pathan, J.; decided 20.02.2026; mediation settlement; Mediation Report dated 16.10.2025; Compromise Terms marked 'X'; permanent alimony Rs. 4,00,000/-; withdrawal of Rs. 2,00,000/- deposit pursuant to Court order dated 02.12.2024; Demand Draft dated 22.08.2025; appeal disposed of in terms of compromise.

What did the court decide?

Second Appeal disposed of in terms of the Compromise Terms; respondent–wife permitted to withdraw the Rs. 2,00,000/- deposited pursuant to the Court's order dated 02.12.2024; the remaining Rs. 2,00,000/- already paid to her by Demand Draft dated 22.08.2025; parties to act in accordance with the Compromise Terms. ¶3

Dnyanoba @Dnyaneshwar Maroti Bembade vs Archana W/O Dnyanoba @Dnyaneshwar Maroti Bembade — Bombay HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶3

Issue for consideration

Whether the Second Appeal should be disposed of in accordance with the amicable settlement reached between the appellant and the respondent through mediation.

¶1

Court's answer

In view of the compromise arrived at between the parties, as reflected in the Mediation Report dated 16.10.2025 and the Compromise Terms annexed thereto, the Second Appeal is disposed of in terms thereof, with the aforesaid directions.

¶3

Ratio / Principle

The dispute is settled upon payment of Rs. 4,00,000/- towards permanent alimony; the Rs. 2,00,000/- deposited before this Court pursuant to the order dated 02.12.2024 is permitted to be withdrawn by the respondent–wife in terms of the Compromise, the remaining Rs. 2,00,000/- having been paid to her by way of Demand Draft dated 22.08.2025.

¶2

Key takeaways

The parties shall act in accordance with the Compromise Terms.ratio¶4

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Second Appeal No. 404 of 2024 (Dnyanoba @ Dnyaneshwar Maroti Bembade v. Archana W/o Dnyanoba @ Dnyaneshwar Maroti Bembade), High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, Mehroz K. Pathan, J., decided 20.02.2026: Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the matter, referred to mediation, had been amicably settled; the Mediation Report dated 16.10.2025 and the duly signed Compromise Terms were taken on record and marked 'X'. The dispute is settled upon payment of Rs. 4,00,000/- towards permanent alimony. Of this, Rs. 2,00,000/- had already been deposited by the appellant–husband by Demand Draft pursuant to this Court's order dated 02.12.2024, and that deposit is permitted to be withdrawn by the respondent–wife in terms of the Compromise; the remaining Rs. 2,00,000/- was paid to her by Demand Draft dated 22.08.2025 and handed over for encashment. In view of the compromise, the Second Appeal is disposed of in terms of the Compromise Terms, and the parties shall act in accordance therewith.

¶1

2026:BHC-AUG:7812

¶2

902 SA NO. 404 OF 2024

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶4

SECOND APPEAL NO. 404 OF 2024

¶5

Dnyanoba @dnyaneshwar Maroti Bembade

¶6

VERSUS

¶7

Archana W/o Dnyanoba @dnyaneshwar Maroti Bembade

¶8

A. V. Patil Indrale , Advocate for Appellant

¶9

CORAM : MEHROZ K. PATHAN, J.

¶10

DATED : 20.02.2026

¶11

PER COURT :

¶12

Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the matter was referred to mediation and the dispute has been amicably settled between the parties. The Mediation Report dated 16.10.2025 is already placed on record. The Compromise Terms are filed along with the said report and are duly signed by the appellant – Dnyanoba @ Dnyaneshwar Maroti Bembade and his learned counsel, as well as the respondent – Archana W/o Dnyanoba @ Dnyaneshwar Maroti Bembade and her learned counsel. The same are taken on record and marked as ‘X’ for identification.

¶13

The Compromise Terms indicate that the dispute between the appellant–husband and the respondent–wife is settled upon payment of Rs. 4,00,000/- towards permanent alimony. Out of the said

¶14

1/2

¶15

Jhs/

¶16

902 SA NO. 404 OF 2024

¶17

amount, Rs. 2,00,000/- has already been deposited by the appellant– husband by way of Demand Draft in pursuance of the order dated 02.12.2024 passed by this Court. The remaining amount of Rs. 2,00,000/- has been paid to the respondent–wife by way of Demand Draft dated 22.08.2025, which has been handed over to her for encashment. The amount of Rs. 2,00,000/- deposited before this Court pursuant to the order dated 02.12.2024 is permitted to be withdrawn by the respondent–wife in terms of the Compromise.

¶18

In view of the compromise arrived at between the parties, as reflected in the Mediation Report dated 16.10.2025 and the Compromise Terms annexed thereto, the Second Appeal is disposed of in terms thereof, with the aforesaid directions.

¶19

The parties shall act in accordance with the Compromise Terms.

¶20

( MEHROZ K. PATHAN, J. )

¶21

2/2

¶22

Jhs/

Dnyanoba @Dnyaneshwar Maroti Bembade v. Archana W/O Dnyanoba @Dnyaneshwar Maroti Bembade

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dnyanoba @Dnyaneshwar Maroti Bembade v. Archana W/O Dnyanoba @Dnyaneshwar Maroti Bembade

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Nilesh Gitaram Gholap vs Sagar Shivaji Kadu and Others

Dnyansagar Alias Nana Vitthal Salve vs the State of Maharashtra

Ramdas Madhavrao Korde vs Shrikant Sudhakar Dahale

Sandip Sampat Shelke vs the State of Maharashtra

Vijay Uttam Avhad and Others vs the State of Maharashtra

Laxman Dagdu Birajdar and Ors. vs Shantabai Maruti Birajdar and Ors.