Hemant Ramrao Bhojane v. Maharashtra State Government Ministry of Housing, Thr Additional Chief Secretary Housing Department

Bombay HC20 Apr 2026RPW/5/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bombay High Court, OOCJ, Review Petition No. 5 of 2026 in Writ Petition No. 4830 of 2024, decided 20 April 2026 (G. S. Kulkarni & Aarti Sathe, JJ.). Review petition against order dated 23 December 2025 disposing of a batch of writ petitions; petitioner in person; grievance of non-redressal by MBRRB held to be independent cause of action, not a ground for review; review petition disposed of with liberty to pursue remedies before MHADA/MBRRB; contentions kept open; no costs.

What did the court decide?

Review Petition disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to pursue any remedy and/or enforce any legal right in appropriate proceedings or before the appropriate authority of the MHADA/MBRRB; contentions of the parties expressly kept open; no costs. ¶¶21

Hemant Ramrao Bhojane vs Maharashtra State Government Ministry of Housing, Thr Additional Chief Secretary Housing Department — Bombay HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶¶21

Issue for consideration

Whether the petitioner's post-disposal grievance (that the MBRRB did not address his complaint pursuant to the Court's directions) can form the basis for maintaining a review petition against the order dated 23 December 2025 disposing of the batch of writ petitions.

¶¶15

Court's answer

The petitioner's grievance that his complaint before the MBRRB was not addressed, pursuant to the directions issued by this Court, constitutes an independent cause of action and cannot form the basis for maintaining a review petition against the order passed on the batch of Writ Petitions.

¶¶15

Ratio / Principle

The Court is not inclined to entertain the Review Petition.

¶¶16

Key takeaways

The Review Petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to pursue any remedy and/or enforce any legal right available to him in appropriate proceedings or before the appropriate authority of the MHADA/MBRRB; all contentions of the parties are expressly kept open; no costs.ratio¶¶19

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Review Petition No. 5 of 2026 in Writ Petition No. 4830 of 2024 (Bombay High Court, OOCJ; G. S. Kulkarni & Aarti Sathe, JJ.; decided 20 April 2026): The petitioner sought review of the order dated 23 December 2025 by which a batch of writ petitions, including his, were disposed of. His grievance was that, pursuant to the directions issued by the Court, he approached the Mumbai Building Repair and Reconstruction Board (MBRRB) but his grievance was not addressed. Held: such a grievance constitutes an independent cause of action and cannot form the basis for maintaining a review petition against the order passed on the batch of writ petitions. The Review Petition was disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to pursue any remedy and/or enforce any legal right in appropriate proceedings or before the appropriate authority of the MHADA/MBRRB, with all contentions expressly kept open and no costs.

Hemant Ramrao Bhojane v. Maharashtra State Government Ministry of Housing, Thr Additional Chief Secretary Housing Department

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Hemant Ramrao Bhojane v. Maharashtra State Government Ministry of Housing, Thr Additional Chief Secretary Housing Department

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Pr Commissioner of Income Tax 5 Mumbai vs Jsw Investment Pvt. Ltd. Ay 13 14 Ita 1085MUM2023

Prinicipal Commissioner of Income Tax 6 Mumbai vs Strides Pharma Science Limited - Ay 2013-14

Pr Commissioner of Income Tax 5 Mumbai vs Jsw Investment Pvt. Ltd. Ay 13 14 Ita 1087MUM2023

Shri. Tukaram Gopal Pagar (Since Decd) through Lrs, Ganpat Tukaram Pagar and Ors. Vs Shri. Sampat Laxman Ugale (Since Decd) through Lrs, and Ors.

K.S. Commodities Private Limited vs Union of India and Ors.

The Divisional Manager Nashik Division 1 vs Shri Manohar Valu Shingade