Petitioner sought a Primary Health Center at Manatha. Petitioner stated the petition's purpose was served. Respondent produced a government resolution sanctioning the Center. The PIL was disposed of as no cause remained.
The Public Interest Litigation stands disposed of as the petitioner's purpose is served.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 908PIL86.2021.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
908 PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 86 OF 2021
Narendra Shivprasad Maliwal VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra And Others
Mr. Jay Veer h/f Mr. Anjali Dube (Bajpai) - Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. Santosh B. Pulkundwar - Advocate for Respondent Nos. 4 and 5
CORAM : SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI
AND HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, JJ.
DATED : 24TH MARCH, 2026
PER COURT : -
2 908PIL86.2021.odt
[HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR] [SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI] JUDGE JUDGE
SG Punde
Signed by: Sandeep Gulabrao Punde Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 25/03/2026 12:38:07
Narendra Shivprasad Maliwal
The State Of Maharashtra
Smt. Vibha Kankanwadi
Hiten S. Venegavkar
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
