The court disposed of PIL No. 7 of 2020 after accepting that the respondents had considered and decided the main grievance. The petitioner is free to pursue appropriate remedies if dissatisfied.
PIL disposed with liberty to the petitioner to take appropriate steps available in law. Deposited security of Rs. 10,000/- credited to HCLS Fund.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2026:BHC-AUG:13986-DB
905-pil-7-2020.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
905 PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.7 OF 2020
Ajay Manohar Shelke VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra And Others
Mr. V. Y. Bhide, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. V. M. Kagne, AGP for Respondents/State.
CORAM : SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI &
HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, JJ.
DATE : 27 MARCH 2026
ORDER (Per Hiten S. Venegavkar, J.) :
. Heard learned Advocate for the petitioner. We have also perused the affidavit-in-reply filed by respondent Nos.3 and 4. Perusal of the affidavit-in-reply makes it clear that the main grievance of the petitioner, pertaining to his complaint dated 16.09.2019 and the issues raised therein, has been taken into consideration by respondent Nos.3 and 4 and accordingly, they have taken final decision and have passed necessary orders thereupon.
[1]
905-pil-7-2020.odt
matter, when now the complaint is decided and the decision is taken, it is open for the petitioner to pursue his appropriate remedies against the said decision, if not satisfied.
scm
[2]
Ajay Manohar Shelke
The State Of Maharashtra
Vibha Kankanwadi
Hiten S. Venegavkar
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
