Dismissed

Dajiram Govind Katare v. the Election Commission of India Thr the Chief Election Commissioner and Ors.

Bombay HC28 Jan 2026PIL/10/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Election-date shifting / postponement denied; writ Court lacks power to alter election schedule fixed by the State Election Commission under statutory and constitutional powers; festivities on polling day; Lakshmi Charan Sen v. A.K.M. Hassan Uzzaman (1985) 4 SCC 689 followed; Rahul Wagh v. State of Maharashtra (SLP(C) No. 19756 of 2021) referred through counsel; PIL No.10 of 2026 (stamp PIL(ST) No

What the court decided

AI extract

Dajiram Govind Katare Vs the Election Commission of India Thr the Chief Election Commissioner and Ors. — Bombay HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶2

PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.10 OF 2026 [ PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (STAMP) NO.2598 OF 2026 ]

¶3

Dajiram Govind Katare, ] R/o. Katarewadi, Ghanand, ] Tal. Atpadi, Dist. Sangli ] .. Petitioner

¶4

Versus

¶5

The Election Commission of India, ] New Delhi ] 2. The State Election Commission, ] Maharashtra ] 3. The State of Maharashtra, ] Through Rural Development and ] Panchayat Raj Department, Mumbai ] 4. The District Collector, Sangli ] 5. The District Collector, Satara ] 6. The District Collector, Solapur ] 7. The District Collector, Pune ] 8. The District Collector, Kolhapur

¶6

] .. Respondents

¶7

Mr. Manish Kelkar, Advocate for the Petitioner.

¶8

Mr. Sachindra B. Shetye with Mr. Akshay Pansare, Advocates for Respondent No.2.

¶9

Mrs. Neha S. Bhide, Government Pleader with Mr. O.A. Chandurkar, Additional Government Pleader and Mrs. G.R. Raghuwanshi, Assistant Government Pleader for Respondent Nos.3 to 8.

¶10

CORAM : SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR, CJ. & GAUTAM A. ANKHAD, J.

¶11

DATE : 28^TH JANUARY 2026.

¶12

P.C. :

¶13

Not on Board. Upon mentioning, taken on Production Board.

¶14

Through this Public Interest Litigation, the petitioner seeks a direction for shifting the date of elections from 5^th February 2026 to 6^th February 2026.

¶15

1/2

¶16

501-PIL(ST)-2598-2026.doc

¶17

Dixit

¶18

The learned counsel for the petitioner states that there have been past precedents where the date of election has been shifted to accommodate the local people on account of festivities falling on the date of election. In support of his submissions, the learned counsel for the petitioner relied upon the judgment rendered by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in “Rahul Wagh v. State of Maharashtra”¹ .

¶19

In the election matters, the dates for election procedure and the date of election are fixed by the State Election Commission in exercise of the statutory and constitutional powers. The writ Court has no powers to issue a direction for shifting of date of election which shall amount to obstructing and delaying the scheduled election to be held at a fixed date. It is settled law, as held by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in “Lakshmi Charan Sen v. A.K.M. Hassan Uzzaman”² that High Court should not pass any orders, interim or otherwise, which has tendency or effect of postponing an election, which are imminent.

¶20

Public Interest Litigation No.10 of 2026 is dismissed.

¶21

[ GAUTAM A. ANKHAD, J. ] [ CHIEF JUSTICE ]

¶22

1 Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.19756 of 2021

¶23

2 (1985) 4 SCC 689

¶24

2/2

¶25

Digitally signed SNEHA by SNEHAABHAY DIXIT ABHAY Date: 2026.02.06 DIXIT 18:06:38 +0530

¶26

501-PIL(ST)-2598-2026.doc

¶27

Dixit

Dajiram Govind Katare v. the Election Commission of India Thr the Chief Election Commissioner and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Dajiram Govind Katare v. the Election Commission of India Thr the Chief Election Commissioner and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Dnyaneshwar Bajirao Darwatkar vs Government of Maharashtra through Its Chief Secretary and Ors.

Nikhil Datta Raut vs the State of Maharashtra Thr. Its Chief Secretary and Ors.

Shahid Nawab Rizvi vs State of Maharashtra to Be Serve through Government Pleader

Majid Madarsa Anjuman Raza-Mustafa vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Bashid Shafik Chikhalekar vs the State of Maharashtra Thr Prin. Revenue Sec, Revenue Dept. and Ors.

Shriniwas Gyandeorao Mundhe vs the Union of India through Its Secretary and Others

Sandeep Pandurang Patil Vs the State of Maharashtra Thr Principal Secretary and Ors.

Sandeep Pandurang Patil vs the State of Maharashtra Thr Principal Secretary and Ors.