Disposed¶5

Victoria Fernandes @ Rodrigues v. Anthony Francis Misquitta (Deceased)

Bombay HC16 Jan 2026MPT/110/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Speaking to minutes of order dated 30.01.2026 by praecipe dated 05.02.2026; correction of first sentence of paragraph No. 3; non-consenting legal heirs have not responded; testamentary and intestate jurisdiction; Bombay High Court; Justice Milind N. Jadhav; Misc. Petition No. 110 of 2025; deceased Anthony Francis Misquitta alias Anthony Francisco Misquitta; petitioner Victoria Fernandes @ Rodrigues; advocates Stephanie Richards and Aishwarya Bhandary.

What did the court decide?

Correction carried out in the order dated 30.01.2026 (first sentence of paragraph No. 3 amended to state that some of the non-consenting legal heirs have not responded at all); corrected order to be uploaded; rest of the order unchanged; praecipe disposed. ¶5

Victoria Fernandes @ Rodrigues vs Anthony Francis Misquitta (Deceased) — Bombay HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

P8. MPT-110-2025.odt

¶2

Amberkar

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶4

TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION

¶5

MISC. PETITION NO. 110 OF 2025

¶6

Anthony Francis Misquitta alias Anthony Francisco Misquitta .. Deceased

¶7

Victoria Fernandes @ Rodrigues .. Petitioner

¶8

Ms. Stephanie Richards a/w Ms. Aishwarya Bhandary, Advocates for Petitioner

¶9

CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J. DATE : FEBRUARY 5, 2026

¶10

P. C.:

¶11

1. Not on board. Mentioned by way of filing a praecipe dated

¶12

05.02.2026 for speaking to the minutes of order dated 30.01.2026.

¶13

Heard Ms. Richards, learned Advocate for Petitioner.

¶14

3. In view of the praecipe filed, first sentence of paragraph No. 3 is

¶15

required to be corrected as under:-

¶16

ORIGINAL SENTENCE	TO BE REPLACED WTIH
"It is prima facie seen that some of	"It is prima facie seen that some of
the non-consenting legal heirs have responded at all."	the non-consenting legal heirs have notresponded at all."