Sau. Prajakta Rahul Bansod v. Rahul Jagdeo Bansod
Case brief
What is this about?
Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench; MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.95 OF 2026; neutral citation 2026:BHC-NAG:6158; decided by Rohit W. Joshi, J. on 20/04/2026. Transfer petition by wife (Sau. Prajakta Rahul Bansod, applicant; counsel D.P. Dapurkar) against non-applicant husband (Rahul Jagdeo Banso; counsel Nilesh Tikar) seeking transfer of Petition No.A-71 of 2025 from Family Court, Amravati to Family Court, Buldhana was REJECTED on grounds that the applicant is a working woman and the 225 km distance between Buldhana and Amravati is served by direct bus connections. Ancillary directions: husband to pay Rs.1500/- per attendance to wife as travelling/other expenses; wife's applications for Video-Conferencing appearance to be considered favourably by the Family Court. No statute or precedent case is cited in the judgment.
What did the court decide?
The application for transfer of Petition No.A-71 of 2025 was rejected; however, the non-applicant/husband was directed to pay Rs.1,500/- to the applicant/wife each time she attends the Family Court proceedings towards travelling and other expenses, and any application by the wife for appearance through Video-Conferencing is to be considered favourably by the learned Family Court.