Allowed
Aditi Ashutosh Patil through Sunil P. Patil (Father) v. Ashutosh Raju Patil
Bombay HCMCA/420/2025
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Allowed
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
KVM
18 - MCA 420 OF 2025.doc
1/2
Digitally signed KANCHANVINODMAYEKAR by KANCHANVINODMAYEKARDate:2026.01.23 19:16:07 +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 420/2025
ADITI ASHUTOSH PATIL THROUGH SUNIL P. PATIL (FATHER)
….. APPLICANT
VERSUS
ASHUTOSH RAJU PATIL
….. RESPONDENT
Adv. Pradeep Dubey for the Applicant.
Adv. Payal Vardhan for the Respondent.
CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL, J.
DATE : 23 JANUARY, 2026
P.C. :-
advocate appearing for the respondent on instructions of the respondent fairly submits that the respondent has no objection if the present Miscellaneous Civil Application is allowed.
2/2
18 - MCA 420 OF 2025.doc
KVM
within a period of four weeks four weeks from today to the Family Court, Buldhana and to be clubbed and heard together with Petition E – 01 of 2025 alongwith A – 11 of 2025. All three matters to be heard by one and the same Judge.
(RAJESH S. PATIL, J.)
ADITI ASHUTOSH PATIL
ASHUTOSH RAJU PATIL
RAJESH S. PATIL
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court