Allowed

Netra Dyaneshwar Girme v. Dyaneshwar Ankush Girme

Bombay HC8 Apr 2026MCA/360/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Wife's transfer application allowed: Marriage Petition No. 206/2024 (divorce proceedings of Respondent-husband) moved from Civil Judge, Senior Division, Satara to Family Court at Pune on grounds of wife's convenience - Pune residence with two children aged about 19 and 17, service commitments, about 110 km distance, children in 10th and 12th standards; reliance on earlier order dated 05.01.2023 in

What did the court decide?

Marriage Petition No. 206/2024 transferred from the Court of Civil Judge, Senior Division, Satara to the Family Court at Pune; the Pune Family Court to hear and decide the petition from the stage at w

Netra Dyaneshwar Girme Vs Dyaneshwar Ankush Girme — Domestic Violence | Bombay HC (2026)

¶1

909-MCA-360-2025.doc

¶2

Digitally signed by HUSENBASHA HUSENBASHA RAHAMAN RAHAMAN NADAF NADAF Date: 2026.04.08 20:04:40 +0530

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 360 OF 2025

¶5

Netra Dyaneshwar Girme ....Applicant V/S Dyaneshwar Ankush Girme ....Respondent

¶6

¶7

Mr. Punit Gehi (through V.C.) for the Applicant. Mr. Dyaneshwar Ankush Girame, Respondent-in-person is present.

¶8

¶9

CORAM : M.M. SATHAYE, J. DATE : 8^th APRIL, 2026

¶10

P.C. :

¶11

Heard learned Advocate for the Applicant-wife and the Respondent-husband in person.

¶12

The application is filed by wife for divorce proceedings filed by the Respondent-husband from the Court of Civil Judge, Senior Division, Satara to Family Court at Pune.

¶13

It is submitted on behalf of Applicant-wife that she is staying at Pune with 2 children, a daughter of about 19 years and son of 17 years. It is submitted that since the Applicant is serving, it is very inconvenient to travel to Satara for attending the divorce proceedings. It is further submitted that the distance between two placed is about 110 km. It is urged that since the Applicant is required to take care of the service and family including 2 young children, it is inconvenient for her to travel to Satara for court-dates.

Husen

909-MCA-360-2025.doc

It is further stated that the children are in crucial academic year of 10^th and 12^th standard and therefore transfer as sought is necessary. Reliance is placed on the order of this Court dated 05.01.2023 passed in MCA/374/2022 by which the proceedings filed by Respondenthusband under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, is already transferred from Satara to Pune after holding that it is inconvenient for the Applicant to attend proceedings at Satara.

¶18

On the other hand, the Respondent-husband appearing in person submitted that the Applicant-wife is neither agreeing for divorce nor cohabiting with him. He submitted that if proceedings are transferred from Satara to Pune, there is likelihood that the proceedings would take a long time and litigation will continue to his prejudice. The Respondent-husband has fairly accepted that he is attending the proceedings filed by the Respondent-wife under the Protection Of Women From Domestic Violence Act, 2005 approximately once in a month at Pune.

¶19

Having heard learned advocate for the Applicant and Respondent in person, and also considering that the convenience of the parties are already considered by this Court under earlier order dated 05.01.2023, in my view, case for transfer has been made out.

¶20

It is informed that the divorce petition is at the stage of filing affidavit of evidence by Respondent-husband.

¶21

Accordingly, miscellaneous civil application is allowed by passing following order:

Husen

909-MCA-360-2025.doc

(a) Marriage Petition No. 206/2024 is transferred from the Court of Civil Judge, Senior Division, Satara to Family Court at Pune.

¶26

(b) Family Court at Pune is directed to hear and decide the said divorce petition from the stage at which it is pending (at the time of transfer) from Satara Court.

¶27

(c) Considering the stage of divorce petition, hearing of said marriage petition is expedited. Both the parties are directed to cooperate with the Court at Pune for expeditious disposal of the divorce petition.

¶28

All concerned to act on duly authenticated or digitally signed copy of this order.

¶29

(M.M. SATHAYE, J.)

¶30

¶31

Husen

Netra Dyaneshwar Girme v. Dyaneshwar Ankush Girme

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Netra Dyaneshwar Girme v. Dyaneshwar Ankush Girme

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases