Shital Mangesh Ahire Alias Shital D/o Panditrao Mahale vs Mangesh Ambadas Ahire

By the present application, the applicant-wife prays for transfer of matrimonial proceeding i. e. Hindu Marriage Petition No. 93 of 2025, filed by the non applicant-husband, which is pending on the file of learned Civil Judge Senior Division, Malegaon, to the file of learned Family Court, Aurangabad, District Aurangabad.

¶11

It is the contention of the applicant-wife that their marriage

¶12

2

¶13

950mca312.25

¶14

was solemnized with respondent/non-applicant in the year 2005 at Kannad, District Aurangabad. Out of the said wedlock they are blessed with two issues i.e. daughter Gargi and son Arnav. The non applicant and his family members harassed her and doubted her chastity. Ultimately, she preferred Hindu Marriage Petition bearing No. A-397 of 2023 at Family Court at Aurangabad.

¶15

The distance between Aurangabad and Malegaon is approximately 160 Kms. The applicant submits that the applicant is having two children and she has to take care of them and therefore, she is facing inconvenience to travel from Aurangabad to Malegaon with minor children to attend the said proceeding. She is also in financial crisis and is unable to incur expenses. However, if she attends the proceeding at Malegaon, in that event she would face lodging and boarding problem there.

¶16

Inspite of service, the non applicant has not resisted the present application for transfer.

¶17

The learned counsel for the applicant relied upon the case of NCV Aishwarya Vs. A.S. Sarvana Karthik Sha -2022, SCC Online SC 1199, wherein, it has been held that,

¶18

“9. The cardinal principle for exercise of power under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure is that the ends of justice should demand the transfer of the suit, appeal or other proceeding. In matrimonial matters, wherever

¶19

3

¶20

950mca312.25

¶21

Courts are called upon to consider the plea of transfer, the Courts have to take into consideration the economic soundness of both the parties, the social strata of the spouses and their behavioural pattern, their standard of life prior to the marriage and subsequent thereto and the circumstances of both the parties in eking out their livelihood and under whose protective umbrella they are seeking their sustenance to life. Given the prevailing socio- economic paradigm in the Indian society, generally, it is the wife’s convenience which must be looked at while considering transfer. ”

¶22

Therefore, considering the above cited case law, it would be just and proper to withdraw the Hindu Marriage Petition No. 93 of 2025, from the file of learned Civil Judge Senior Division, Malegaon and transfer it to the file of learned Family Court, Aurangabad.

¶23

In view of the above discussion, the present application is

¶24

allowed.

¶25

The Hindu Marriage Petition No. 93 of 2025, pending on the file of learned Family Court, Malegaon, is hereby withdrawn and transferred to the file of learned Family Court, Aurangabad, District Aurangabad for trial and disposal according to the law.

¶26

This order be communicated to both the Courts.

¶27

( Y.G. KHOBRAGADE, J.)

¶28

mahajansb/

Shital Mangesh Ahire Alias Shital D/o Panditrao Mahale v. Mangesh Ambadas Ahire

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shital Mangesh Ahire Alias Shital D/o Panditrao Mahale v. Mangesh Ambadas Ahire

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Meharaj Abdul Khayum Patel vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Saifullah Abutayyab Sheikh vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Rajendra Hiraman Nikam vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Vinod Dadaji Pawar vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Pallavi W/o. Vishal Tekale vs Vishal S/o. Baburao Tekale

Sayli Wo Akshay Pawar vs Akshay S/o Satish Pawar