Mutual divorce decree obtained during pendency; prayer in Misc. Civil Application No. 235/2024 (Nikita Mundhe v. Vaibhav Mundhe) did not sustain; application disposed of as infructuous; Aurangabad bench; Judge Y.G. Khobragade; advocate M.B. Gitte h/f Tayde Pooja H.; decision date 17.01.2026.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2026:BHC-AUG:2248
( 1 ) 922 mca 235.24
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
922 MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 235 OF 2024
NIKITA W/O VAIBHAV MUNDHE VERSUS VAIBHAV S/O VAIJNATH MUNDHE
Advocate for Applicant : Mr. M.B. Gitte h/f. Tayde Pooja H.
CORAM : Y.G. KHOBRAGADE, J. DATE : 17.01.2026
P.C.:-
submits that during the pendency of present application the applicant and the non-applicant have mutually obtained the decree of divorce.
sustain and accordingly the application is disposed of as infructuous.
[Y.G. KHOBRAGADE, J.]
mubashir
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the prayer in the present application sustains, given that the applicant and the non-applicant have mutually obtained a decree of divorce during its pendency.
NIKITA W/O VAIBHAV MUNDHE
VAIBHAV S/O VAIJNATH MUNDHE
Y.G. KHOBRAGADE
As recorded by the court registry
6 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
