Allowed

Avinash Pundalik Pashte v. Sapna Virendrashingh Sarwan Alias Sapna Ratnakar Rane and Aanandi v Sarwan (Minor)

Bombay HC22 Apr 2026IGP/1/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Bombay High Court allowed an Indian Guardianship Petition seeking appointment of the Petitioners as legal guardians of a minor biological daughter of the Respondent. The court approved the appointment after reviewing medical fitness, financial stability, and a Home Study Report, dispensing with notice under Section 11 of the Guardians and Wards Act.

What did the court decide?

Petition allowed; Petitioners appointed as legal guardians of the minor; Notice under Section 11 of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 dispensed with.

Avinash Pundalik Pashte vs Sapna… — Child Custody and Guardianship | Bombay HC (2026)

¶1

IGP/1/2026

¶2

JYOTIPRAKASHPAWAR Digitallysigned byJYOTIPRAKASHPAWARDate:2026.04.3011:38:24+0530

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION AND

¶4

IN ITS GENERAL AND INHERENT JURISDICTION

¶5

INDIAN GUARDIANSHIP PETITION NO. 1 OF 2026

¶6

Avinash Pundalik Pashte,

¶7

age: 44 years, Occupation: Service and

¶8

Sanika Avinash Pashte, age: 39 years, Occupation: Housewife Both Indian Nationals, residing at Sai Darshan Apartments, Ground Floor, Near Sant Gadge Hospital, Sainath Nagar, Vasind, Shahapur, Maharashtra – 421 601. … Petitioners

¶9

And

¶10

1. Sapna Virendrasingh Sarwan alias

¶11

Sapna Ratnakar Rane, age: 29 years, Indian National, residing at Kanchan Row House, Room No. 2, Sambhaji Nagar, Ashok Nagar, Satpur, Nashik – 422 012. … Respondent

¶12

Mr. Rakesh K. L. Kapoor i/b M/s. Rakesh K. L. Kapoor for Petitioners. Mr. O. Hareendran – Scrutiny Officer – ICSW is present. Mr. Avinash P. Pashte – Adoptive Father is present. Ms. Sanika A. Pashte – Adoptive Mother is present. Kum. Aanandi is present.

¶13

Page 1 of 6

¶14

------------------------------------Order dated 22^nd April 2026

¶15

IGP/1/2026

¶16

Mr. Dilip S. Gurav , Chamber Registrar is present.

¶17

CORAM : FARHAN P. DUBASH, J. DATE : 22^nd APRIL 2026

¶18

ORDER:

¶19

By this Indian Guardianship Petition, the Petitioners have sought their appointment as legal guardians of the female minor Aanandi Virendrasingh Sarwan (minor) born on 4^th September 2023 at Green Life Multispecialty Hospital, Nallasopara East, District Palghar. The minor is the biological daughter of the Respondent, namely Sapna Virendrasingh Sarwan alias Sapna Ratnakar Rane. It is stated that the

¶20

minor was born outside of wedlock and illegitimately to the Respondent. It is further stated that the minor’s putative father refused to take on any responsibility for the minor and left the Respondent and the minor. Since the Respondent was young, unprepared to raise the minor, and had no support from any relative, she relinquished the minor to the Petitioners.

¶21

The Respondent was introduced to the Petitioners through the Petitioners’ family doctor, Dr. Sneha Shinde of Green Life Multispecialty Hospital, where the minor was born. Thereafter, Respondent handed

¶22

Page 2 of 6

¶23

------------------------------------Order dated 22^nd April 2026

¶24

IGP/1/2026

¶25

over the minor to the Petitioners on 9^th October 2023. The Foster Care Agreement dated 9^th October 2023 is placed on record.

¶26

Since the minor has been residing with the Petitioners and is stated to have integrated into the Petitioners’ family, the Petitioners have decided to take the minor in legal guardianship with the consent of the Respondent and have accordingly filed the present Petition. The Respondent's Consent Affidavit is placed on record.

¶27

The Birth Certificate dated 27^th October 2023 of the minor issued by the Vasai-Virar City Municipal Corporation, Prabhag F, Nallasopara West, is placed on record.

¶28

The Petitioners are Indian Nationals presently residing at Vasind, Shahapur, Maharashtra, aged about 44 and 39 years respectively. They have been married for the past 19 years, since 25^th May 2006 and have no biological children. The Certificate of Registration of Marriage and Motivation to Adopt are placed on record.

¶29

The Medical Fitness Certificates of the Petitioners dated 29^th July 2025 and 5^th August 2025 are on record and state that both the Petitioners

¶30

Page 3 of 6

¶31

------------------------------------Order dated 22^nd April 2026

¶32

IGP/1/2026

¶33

are physically and mentally fit. Their HIV and HBsAg test reports certify the case as non-reactive.

¶34

Petitioner No.1 has been working as a worker with Brihanmumbai Mahanagar Palika since 2018, and his gross monthly salary for November 2025 is stated to be Rs. 56,698.07/-. His salary slips and Form No. 16 are placed on record. Petitioner No. 2 is a homemaker.

¶35

The Petitioners’ proof of residence, copies of PAN Card and Aadhaar Card, and supportive financial documents are placed on record.

¶36

The Home Study Report dated 1^st November 2025 of Social Worker Ms. Clipsy Banji, BA, MSW, PGPDM, Vasai, District Palghar, is on record, and the report has found the Petitioners suitable for taking the female minor in guardianship.

¶37

The recommendation letters from close friends in support of this guardianship are placed on record.

¶38

The Child Security Undertaking dated 19^th December 2025, given by Petitioner No.2’s younger brother, residing at Bhiwandi, District Thane,

¶39

Page 4 of 6

¶40

------------------------------------Order dated 22^nd April 2026

¶41

IGP/1/2026

¶42

to look after the minor in case of any mishap to the Petitioners, is placed on record.

¶43

The Medical Certificate dated 27^th March 2025 of the minor is placed on record and states that she is fit, of appropriate weight for her age, has achieved all milestones according to her age, and has received all vaccines scheduled in India. The postcard-size photograph of the minor is also placed on record.

¶44

The consent and undertaking of the Petitioners is placed on record and states, inter alia, that they have consented to the legal guardianship and undertake to do all such acts, deeds and things as may be necessary in the interest of the mental and physical welfare of the minor.

¶45

Mr. O. Hareendran, Scrutiny Officer, has tendered a Report / Representation of the Indian Council of Social Welfare dated 22^nd April 2026, which is taken on record and marked “X” for identification.

¶46

Having considered the material on record as well as the Report of the Scrutiny Officer marked “X”, I am of the view that the reliefs sought in the present Petition are required to be granted.

¶47

Page 5 of 6

¶48

------------------------------------Order dated 22^nd April 2026

¶49

IGP/1/2026

¶50

In these circumstances, the Petition is allowed in terms of prayer

¶51

clauses (a) to (c) of the Petition, which read thus:

¶52

(a) That this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to appoint the Petitioners as legal guardians of the person of the said female minor Aanandi Virendrasingh Sarwan, born on 4^th September 2023.

¶53

(b) That the Notice under Section 11 of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890, is dispensed with.

¶54

(c) That the Petitioners may be granted leave to remove the said minor outside the jurisdiction of this Hon’ble Court and to take the said minor whenever required.

¶55

The Indian Guardianship Petition is accordingly disposed of. There

¶56

shall be no order as to costs.

¶57

(FARHAN P. DUBASH, J.)

¶58

Shubham Gadhavepatil

¶59

Page 6 of 6

¶60

Order dated 22^nd April 2026

Avinash Pundalik Pashte v. Sapna Virendrashingh Sarwan Alias Sapna Ratnakar Rane and Aanandi v Sarwan (Minor)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Avinash Pundalik Pashte v. Sapna Virendrashingh Sarwan Alias Sapna Ratnakar Rane and Aanandi v Sarwan (Minor)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Brassica Pharma Private Limited vs Rupali Manohar Sirsavakar Now Known as Rupali Manoj Naik

Chandrika B Sugavanam Wife of B Sugabanam vs S R Nathan Alias P B Ranganathan Alias

Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited vs the State of Maharashtra through Government Pleader

Maharashtra State Women Council Adoption Group at Maharashtra State Womens Council vs Prasad Pradip Sawant

Shraddhanand Mahilashram. vs Niraj Ashok Jani and Kastooree Tolmare (Pros. Adoptive Parents) and Minor Mira Jani

Vatsalya Trust vs Pravin Ram Pawar (Pro.Ado Parents) and Yashada Alias Yashada Pravin Pawar (Minor)