Disposed

Sagar Paresh Gosaliya v. State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Bombay HC17 Jan 2026IA/94/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Suspension of sentence pending disposal of criminal appeal; Bombay High Court Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction; Shivkumar Dige, J.; Interim Application in Criminal Appeal; Sections 353 and 332 IPC; short-term sentence; applicant on bail during trial without misuse; fine deposited; objection on apprehension of absconding; PR bond Rs.15,000/- with one or two sureties; bail bonds before Additional Ses

What did the court decide?

Substantive sentence of imprisonment suspended pending disposal of Criminal Appeal No. 37 of 2026, subject to a PR bond of Rs.15,000/- with one or two sureties in the like amount, the bonds to be furn

Sagar Paresh Gosaliya Vs State of Maharashtra and Anr. — Bombay HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

94-IA-94-2026 IN APEAL-37-2026.doc

¶2

N.S.Kamble

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 94 OF 2026 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 37 OF 2026

¶5

Sagar Paresh Gosaliya … Applicant

¶6

Versus

¶7

Digitally signed NILAM by NILAM SANTOSH SANTOSHKAMBLE KAMBLE Date: 2026.01.20 11:31:09 +0530

¶8

State Of Maharashtra And Anr … Respondents

¶9

Mr.Himanshu R. More a/w Mr.Ashi Naryan h/f Mr.Prakash Sabingikar, for the Applicant. Mr.P.P. Jadhav, APP for Respondent-State.

¶10

¶11

CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.

¶12

DATE : 17^th JANUARY, 2026

¶13

P.C. :

¶14

. This is an application for suspension of sentence.

¶15

1. Heard learned counsel for the Applicant and the learned

¶16

Additional Public Prosecutor.

¶17

The Applicant has been convicted for the offence punishable

¶18

under Section 353 and 332 of the Indian Penal Code (‘IPC’ for short).

¶19

The maximum sentence imposed on the Applicant for the offence

¶20

Page 1 of 3

¶21

94-IA-94-2026 IN APEAL-37-2026.doc

¶22

N.S.Kamble

¶23

punishable under Section 353 is two years with fine of Rs.5,000/- and Section 332 is one year and simple imprisonment (‘SI’ for short) with fine of Rs.2,500/-. The learned Sessions Court has suspended the sentence during the appeal period and has granted interim bail to the Applicant.

¶24

During the trial the Applicant was on bail. The Applicant has deposited the fine amount. It may take time to dispose of the Appeal. Hence, requested to allow the Application.

¶25

The learned APP and learned counsel for Respondent No.2

¶26

strongly objected to allow the Application on the ground that if the Applicant released on bail, he may abscond. Hence, requested to reject the Application.

¶27

Considering the submission of both learned counsel as well as sentence imposed on the Applicant is short term sentence. During trial Applicant was on bail. He has not misused the liberty. Considering these facts, the sentence is suspended till final disposal of the Appeal.

¶28

The Application is disposed of in the following terms.

¶29

Page 2 of 3

¶30

94-IA-94-2026 IN APEAL-37-2026.doc

¶31

N.S.Kamble

¶32

ORDER

¶33

(i) The substantive sentence of imprisonment awarded to the applicant is hereby suspended pending disposal of the appeal, subject to the applicant furnishing a PR bond in the sum of Rs.15,000/- with one or two sureties in the like amount.

¶34

(ii) The bail bonds to be furnished before the learned Additional Sessions Judge.

¶35

(iii) The Criminal Application is disposed of.

¶36

(SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)

¶37

Page 3 of 3

Sagar Paresh Gosaliya v. State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sagar Paresh Gosaliya v. State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases