Mahaguj Collieries Limited v. Adani Enterprises Limited
Case brief
What is this about?
Procedural 'speaking to the minutes' correction order, High Court of Judicature at Bombay (OOCJ), Sandeep V. Marne, J., dated 9 April 2026. Parties: Mahajug Collieries Limited (petitioner; counsel Anupreeta Bhat and Indraneel Nanoti, i/b Little & Co.) v. Adani Enterprises Limited (respondent; counsel Ashischandra Rao, Ria Dalwani, Urja Thakkar, i/b Economic Laws Practice). Pertains to Commercial Arbitration Petition No. 859 of 2024 and Interim Application No. 924 of 2026 in Commercial Arbitration Petition (L.) No. 1572 of 2024. Motion allowed; corrections to order dated 1 April 2026 carried out (cause-title, para-1 wording, added para-4); Respondent to file Affidavit-in-Reply within 4 weeks; both petitions listed on 15 June 2026. No statutes, precedents, dissents, or monetary amounts.
What did the court decide?
All three corrections to the order dated 1 April 2026 sanctioned: cause-title to reflect Commercial Arbitration Petition (L.) No. 1572 of 2024; para-1 wording replaced with the full petition number; para-4 added granting the Respondent liberty to file an Affidavit-in-Reply within 4 weeks and listing both petitions on 15 June 2026.