Abdul Hamid Murtuza Sayed v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Bombay High Court interim order dated 16 April 2026 (R.N. Laddha, J.) allowing intervention application IA 915/2026 in anticipatory bail application ABA 556/2026 (Kazim Hanif Khan and Anr. v. State of Maharashtra); intervenor Abdul Hamid Murtuza Sayed to be impleaded as respondent No. 2 with forthwith amendment; ad-interim relief, if any, continued till next date; matter stood over to 20 April 2026; no statute or precedent cited; purely procedural disposal.
What did the court decide?
Intervention application allowed in terms of prayer clause (a); applicant in ABA directed to implead the intervenor as a party respondent with necessary amendment to be carried out forthwith; copy of the application to be provided to learned Counsel for respondent No. 2 / intervenor during the course of the day; ad-interim relief granted earlier, if any, to continue till the next date; matter stood over to 20 April 2026.