Tulshiram Baba Jadhav and Ors. v. Bhau Sitaram Jadhav and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Condonation of delay; bringing on record heirs and legal representatives of deceased appellant; addition of daughters as appellant nos. 7, 8 and 9; sons already on record in a different capacity; amendment of array of parties; Second Appeal No. 968 of 2006; Second Appeal No. 970 of 2006; Interim Application No. 7814 of 2024; Interim Application No. 7820 of 2024; Bombay High Court; Civil Appellate Jurisdiction; Gauri Godse J.; order dated 12 February 2026; Tulshiram Baba Jadhav v. Bhau Sitaram Jadhav; leave to succeeding counsel for photocopy of papers; removal of second appeals from daily board.
What did the court decide?
Delay condoned; applications allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b), bringing the daughters of deceased appellant no. 1 on record as appellant nos. 7, 8 and 9; amendment to be carried out in four weeks; leave granted to take photocopy of the papers filed by the earlier advocate on payment of necessary charges as per Rules; second appeals removed from the daily board.