Disposed¶47

One 97 Communications Limited v. John Doe

Bombay HC7 Mar 2026IA/7275/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bombay High Court (OOCJ), Gauri Godse J, order dated 16-02-2026 in five interim applications in Commercial IP Suit No. 47 of 2026: IAL/25607/2025 (WhatsApp LLC v. 360 One Wam Limited), IAL/18340/2025 (360 One Wam Limited v. John Doe), IA/4899/2025 (Meta Platform Inc. v. 360 One Wam Limited), IAL/30671/2025 (Bharti Airtel Limited v. 360 One Wam Limited) and IA/7275/2025 (One 97 Communications Limited v. John Doe). Part-heard matters stood over to 23-02-2026, to be listed after earlier part-heard matters; ad-interim relief granted earlier to continue till the next date. Adjournment order only: no merits decided, no statutes or precedents cited.

What did the court decide?

Adjournment of part-heared matters to 23rd February 2026 (to be listed after the earlier part-heard matters), with ad-interim relief granted earlier continuing till the next date.

One 97 Communications Limited vs John Doe — Bombay HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Adjournment of part-heared matters to 23rd February 2026 (to be listed after the earlier part-heard matters), with ad-interim relief granted earlier continuing till the next date.

¶47

Ratio / Principle

The interim applications, being part-heard, stand over to 23rd February 2026.

¶45

Key takeaways

The matters are to be listed after the earlier part-heard matters.ratio¶46
Ad-interim relief granted earlier shall continue till the next date.ratio¶47

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Procedural (adjournment) order of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction (Coram: Gauri Godse, J.), dated 16 February 2026, taking together five interim applications in Commercial IP Suit No. 47 of 2026: Interim Application (L) No. 25607 of 2025 (WhatsApp LLC v. 360 One Wam Limited), Interim Application (L) No. 18340 of 2025 (360 One Wam Limited v. John Doe), Interim Application No. 4899 of 2025 (Meta Platform Inc. v. 360 One Wam Limited), Interim Application (L) No. 30671 of 2025 (Bharti Airtel Limited v. 360 One Wam Limited) and Interim Application No. 7275 of 2025 (One 97 Communications Limited v. John Doe). The matters, which were part-heard, stand over to 23 February 2026 and are to be listed after the earlier part-heard matters; ad-interim relief granted earlier continues till the next date. Appearances: Hiren Kamod with Chirag Naik, Noopur Mathrawala and Kshemendra Bharadwaj (i/b. MZM Legal LLP) for the Plaintiffs; Arvind Datar, Senior Advocate (through VC), with eight juniors (i/b. Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas) for Defendant No. 7; Ameya Gokhale with five others (i/b. Mangaldas & Co.) for the Applicant in IA/4899/2025 (Meta Platform Inc.), described in the appearance line as Defendant No. 6 in COMIP/47/2026; Bargavi Baradhwaj (i/b. Saikrishna & Associates) for the Applicant in IA/7275/2025 (One 97 Communications Limited), described as Defendant No. 9 in COMIP/47/2026; Rahul Gaikwad with two others (i/b. Gravitas Legal) for Defendant No. 8; Paras Pawar (i/b. P. B. Gujar) for Respondent 10 in IAL/25607/2025. No contention was argued or decided; no statute or precedent was cited.

¶1

35-IAL-25607-2025.docx

¶2

rrpillai

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION (L) NO. 25607 OF 2025 IN

¶4

COMMERCIAL IP SUIT NO. 47 OF 2026

¶5

WHATSAPP LLC … Applicant

¶6

Vs.

¶7

360 One Wam Limited … Defendant

¶8

WITH

¶9

INTERIM APPLICATION (L) NO. 18340 OF 2025 IN

¶10

COMMERCIAL IP SUIT NO. 47 OF 2026

¶11

360 One Wam Limited … Applicant

¶12

Vs. John Doe … Defendant

¶13

WITH

¶14

INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 4899 OF 2025 IN

¶15

COMMERCIAL IP SUIT NO. 47 OF 2026

¶16

Meta Platform Inc. … Applicant

¶17

vs.

¶18

360 One Wam Limited … Respondent

¶19

WITH INTERIM APPLICATION (L) NO. 30671 OF 2025 IN

¶20

COMMERCIAL IP SUIT NO. 47 OF 2026

¶21

Bharti Airtel Limited … Applicants

¶22

Vs.

¶23

360 One Wam Limited … Respondents

¶24

WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 7275 OF 2025

¶25

Digitally signed by RAJESHWARI RAJESHWARI RAMESH RAMESH PILLAI PILLAI Date: 2026.02.18 18:51:38 +0530

¶26

1/3

¶27

35-IAL-25607-2025.docx

¶28

IN COMMERCIAL IP SUIT NO. 47 OF 2026

¶29

One 97 Communications

… Applicant

Limited

Vs.

John Doe

… Defendant

Mr. Hiren Kamod a/w. Mr. Chirag Naik, Ms. Noopur Mathrawala and Mr. Kshemendra Bharadwaj i/b.MZM Legal LLP for the Plaintiffs.

¶36

Mr. Paras Pawar i/b. Mr. P. B. Gujar for Respondent 10 in IAL/25607/2025.

¶37

Mr. Arvind Datar, Senior Advocate (through VC) a/w. Ms. Swati Agarwal, Mr. Rishabh Jaisani, Mr. Shashank Mishra, Mr. Harit Lakhani, Ms. Richa Bharti, Ms. Vedika Rathore, Mr. Abhishek Mookherjee and Mr. Swaroop Saha i/b. Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas for Defendant No. 7.

¶38

Mr. Ameya Gokhale a/w. Mr. Varun Pathak, Ms. Amee Rana, Mr. Vishesh Sharma, Ms. Richa Bharti and Ms. Prasidhi Agarwal i/b. M/s. Mangaldas & Co.for the Applicant in IA/4899/2025 – Defendant No. 6 in COMIP/47/2026.

¶39

Ms. Bargavi Baradhwaj i/b. M/s. Saikrishna & Associates for the Applicant in IA/7275/2025 and Defendant No. 9 in COMIP/47/2026.

¶40

Mr. Rahul Gaikwad a/w. Ms. Nikita Abhyankar and Ms. Komal Singh i/b. Gravitas Legal for Defendant No. 8.

¶41

CORAM : GAURI GODSE, J. DATE : 16^th FEBRUARY 2026

¶42

2/3

¶43

35-IAL-25607-2025.docx

¶44

ORDER :

¶45

Part-heard. Stand over to 23^rd February 2026.

¶46

To be listed after the earlier part-heard matters.

¶47

Ad-interim relief granted earlier to continue till the next

¶48

date.

¶49

[GAURI GODSE, J.]

¶50

3/3

One 97 Communications Limited v. John Doe

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

One 97 Communications Limited v. John Doe

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Jbm Industries Limited vs Bharat Petroleum Corporation limited

Pvr Inox Limited vs the Chief Controlling Revenue Authority Maharashtra State

Bajaj Auto Limited vs the Municipal Corporation of the City of Pimpri Chinchwad and Ors.

Alhaj Ebrahim Khan S/O Ahmed Khan (Since Decd) through Lrs. and Ors. vs Sopan Pandharinath Lohakare

Mr Mahesh Bhosale vs Arun Shankar Bhosale

Mr. Mahesh Bhosale vs Shri Arun Shankar Bhosale