Anilkumar Parshuram Mistry v. Prince Hygiene Tissue Products

Bombay HC20 Feb 2026IA/700/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Interim application allowed for relocation/handover of seized infringing goods; Court Receiver to deliver seized and sealed material to Plaintiff at Defendant's vacated licensed tenanted premises; ex-parte ad-interim relief and seizure commission of 6 March 2025; Commercial IP suit; Bombay High Court Commercial Division; report due on next date; matter adjourned to 2 April 2026; ad-interim relief continued.

What did the court decide?

Seized goods to be handed over into the Plaintiff's possession by the Court Receiver on 17 March 2026 at 11:30 a.m.; ad-interim relief granted earlier to continue till the next date. ¶¶27

Anilkumar Parshuram Mistry vs Prince Hygiene Tissue Products — Bombay HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Seized goods to be handed over into the Plaintiff's possession by the Court Receiver on 17 March 2026 at 11:30 a.m.; ad-interim relief granted earlier to continue till the next date.

¶¶27

Issue for consideration

Whether the seized material (infringing goods held under the Court Receiver's custody in the Defendant's vacated tenanted premises) should be relocated and handed over into the Plaintiff's possession.

¶¶17

Court's answer

Since the commission has been executed and the goods were seized and sealed in the Defendant's licensed (tenanted) premises, the seized material is to be handed over into the possession of the Plaintiff in the presence of the Court Receiver and the representatives of the Plaintiff and the Defendants.

¶¶24

Ratio / Principle

The Court Receiver shall visit the concerned premises on 17 March 2026 at 11:30 a.m., hand over the seized goods to the Plaintiff, and furnish a report to this Court on the next date.

¶¶25

Key takeaways

The Interim Application is allowed in the aforesaid terms, and the ad-interim relief granted earlier is to continue till the next date (matter stood over to 2nd April 2026).ratio¶¶27

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

High Court of Bombay, Commercial Division (Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction), order dated 12 March 2026 delivered by Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J.: In Interim Application No. 700 of 2026 filed in Commercial IP (L) Suit No. 6629 of 2025 (Arvind Mehta v. Anilkumar Parshuram Mistry & Anr.), the applicant (original Defendant No. 1) sought relocation of seized material as he had vacated the tenanted premises. Pursuant to the ex-parte ad-interim order dated 6 March 2025 appointing a Court Receiver who had executed the commission and seized and sealed the infringing goods in the Defendant's licensed premises, the Court directed that the seized material be handed over into the possession of the Plaintiff in the presence of the Court Receiver and the representatives of both parties. The Court Receiver was directed to visit the concerned premises on 17 March 2026 at 11:30 a.m. and hand over the seized goods to the Plaintiff, furnishing a report to the Court on the next date. The matter stood over to 2 April 2026, the Interim Application was allowed in these terms, and the earlier ad-interim relief was continued till the next date.

Anilkumar Parshuram Mistry v. Prince Hygiene Tissue Products

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anilkumar Parshuram Mistry v. Prince Hygiene Tissue Products

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Saint-Gobain India Private Limited vs Hitesh O. Baheti

Sanjeev Nakul Thorat vs Ms Thorat Wine mart

Narendra Lalchand Mehta vs Nayana Manoj Vasani

Cello Plastic Industrial Works vs Royal Plast

Balram Jaiprakash Dubey vs Suresh Jawaharlal Tiwari

Mr. G. Chandra Shekaran vs Shivshahi Punarvan Praklap Limited and Anr.