Allowed¶16

Ashok Keshav Karambelkar v. Raghunath Keshav Karambelkar

Bombay HC5 Jan 2026IA/6915/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bombay HC Testamentary/Intestate; IA 6915/2025 in TS 89/2008 in TP 896/2008; Ashok Keshav Karambelkar v Raghunath Keshav Karambelkar (deceased 17.07.2025) / Shubhangi Raghunath Karambelkar & Anr.; joinder/substitution of legal heirs of deceased defendant; allowed per Prayer Clause (a); amendment within two weeks; serve copy on newly added defendants; Judge Farhan P. Dubash; order dated 05.01.2026; counsel Nachiket Jaywant (i/b Vinit D. Jawle), Satya M. Shettigar; no statutory provisions or case citations.

What did the court decide?

Interim Application allowed in terms of Prayer Clause (a): legal heirs of the deceased Defendant to be brought on record; amendment to be carried out within two weeks with a copy served on the newly added Defendants. ¶16

Ashok Keshav Karambelkar vs Raghunath Keshav Karambelkar — Bombay HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

7-A. IA/6915/2025 Ashok Vs. Ragunath

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION

¶3

INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 6915 OF 2025

¶4

¶5

TESTAMENTARY SUIT NO. 89 OF 2008 IN

¶6

TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO. 896 OF 2008

¶7

Ashok Keshav Karambelkar	…	Applicant
IN THE MATTER OF
Smt. Sushila Keshav Karambelkar	…	Deceased
Ashok Keshav Karambelkar	…	Petitioner
Vs.
Raghunath Keshav Karambelkar	…	Defendant
Shubhangi Raghunath Karambelkar & Anr,	… (Pro	Respondents/ ps. Defendants)

¶8

Mr. Nachiket Jaywant i/b Vinit D. Jawle for the Applicant/Petitioner Mr. Satya M. Shettigar for the Defendant

¶9

CORAM : FARHAN P. DUBASH, J. DATE : 05^th JANUARY 2026

¶10

ORDER:

¶11

The present Interim Application has been taken out to bring on

¶12

record the legal heirs of the deceased Raghunath Keshav Karambelkar,

¶13

Defendant who is stated to have passed away on 17^th July 2025.

¶14

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Order dated 5Page 1 of 2^th January 2026

¶15

7-A. IA/6915/2025 Ashok Vs. Ragunath

¶16

Mr. Shettigar, learned Counsel who appears on behalf of the Defendant has no objection and accordingly, the present Interim Application is allowed in terms of Prayer Clause (a).

¶17

The Applicant/Petitioner shall carry out amendment within a period of two weeks from today and serve a copy on the newly added Defendants.

¶18

Digitally signed by JYOTI JYOTI PRAKASH PRAKASH PAWAR PAWAR Date:2026.01.06 17:40:53 +0530

¶19

( FARHAN P. DUBASH, J. )

¶20

Jyoti

¶21

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Order dated 5Page 2 of 2^th January 2026

Ashok Keshav Karambelkar v. Raghunath Keshav Karambelkar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ashok Keshav Karambelkar v. Raghunath Keshav Karambelkar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Hyland Park Co-Operative Housing Society Ltd. vs the Competent Authority and Sitrict Deputy Registrar Co-Operative Societies Mumbai City IV

Abhishek Mhashilkar vs Ankush S/O Krishna Mhasilkar

M/S. G. K. Associates Thr. Its Prop. Mr. Vinod Premchand Chandwani vs Mrs. Krushnabai Alias Laxmi Bajirao Kalapure and Others

Ashok Keshav Karambelkar vs Raghunath Keshav Karambelkar

Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited vs the State of Maharashtra through Government Pleader

Suman Shivbahadur Singh vs Anvi Amit Singh and Virat Amit Kumar Singh (Minor)