Mangalam Jewellers through its Partner Deepak Patil v. Icici Lombard Genereal Insurance
Case brief
What is this about?
Purely procedural order of the Bombay High Court dated 9 June 2026 by Arun R. Pedneker, J. in Interim Application No. 5607 of 2025, taken with Commercial Arbitration Application (L) No. 40115 of 2022 (Mangalam Jewellers through partner Deepak Patil v. ICICI Lombard Genereal Insurance — respondent's name spelled 'Genereal' in the source). Restoration application with condonation-of-delay prayer: applicant's counsel Adv. Jash Dalia was unaware of the listing for removal of office objections under a common notice dated 26 August 2024 giving eight weeks; respondent represented by Adv. Yashesh Kamdar, Adv. Gauri Joshi, instructed by Ganesh & Co. Court condoned the delay, allowed the application (restoring the dismissed arbitration application), and imposed Rs.2,000/- costs payable to the High Court Legal Services Authority within four weeks. No statute or precedent cited.
What did the court decide?
Delay condoned and the Restoration Application allowed, effectively restoring the dismissed Commercial Arbitration Application (L) No. 40115 of 2022; costs of Rs.2,000/- payable to the High Court Legal Services Authority within four weeks.