Preeti M Bokadia vs Keemaya Build Pvt. Ltd.

Learned Advocates for the parties jointly submit that all disputes and differences underlying the captioned Suit stand fully and finally settled by them subject to the terms and conditions contained in Consent Terms dated February 10, 2026.

¶44

Mr. Khan on behalf of the Plaintiff, explains that out of the eight flats that constituted the suit property, which were not delivered to the Plaintiff, the parties have resolved their disputes by providing that Defendant Nos.1, 2, 3 and newly added Defendant No.15 would discharge the owed obligations both in terms of money as well as delivery of flats in a different project being conducted by the newly added Defendant No.15, which is the holding company of Defendant No. 2, with 100% equity ownership.

¶45

Page 2 of 5

¶46

February 18, 2026

¶47

Ashwini Vallakati

¶48

902-IA-6514-2025+.doc

¶49

Defendant No. 15 has stepped in to underwrite and discharge the obligations contained in the Consent Terms arrived at between the parties. There is therefore consensus on adding “Memphis Realtors Private Limited", the said holding company , as a newly added Defendant No.15. An Application to this effect has also been filed, but it is yet to be numbered. However, the parties have consensus to an oral application backed by the filing that has already been made, being the basis of including Defendant No.15 within the array of parties for purposes of the proceedings and settling the same. The Registry shall number of the application within a week, and treat it as disposed of by this order, which is deferred until the application is numbered

¶50

Learned Advocate representing Defendant No.2 files a vakalatnama also for Defendant No.15, which is taken on record. The Registry shall update the record to include the newly added Defendant No.15 and as stated above, this order would be treated as disposing of the application for inclusion of Defendant No.15.

¶51

A separate project being implemented by Defendant No.15 entails certain properties that would be given to the Plaintiff. So also, Flat No.2603 on the 26^th floor of the ‘B’ wing , which is one of the flats forming part of the suit properties, is expected to be handed over to the

Page 3 of 5

February 18, 2026

Ashwini Vallakati

902-IA-6514-2025+.doc

¶56

Plaintiff upon resolving disputes over third party interests already created thereon with another third party. I n the absence of such dispute resolution being feasible, the Consent Terms entail monetary payment to the Plaintiff. As a part of the Consent Terms, Defendant Nos.4 to 14 are not proceeded against, with Defendants No. 1 to 3 and 15 assuring performance of the settlement terms to the Plaintiff.

¶57

In these circumstances, taking on board the submissions by the parties that nothing contained in the Consent Terms is in conflict with any other instrument or contract to which any of the parties are subject, and the fact that there is no conflict with any requirement of law, the undertakings in the Consent Terms are accepted as undertakings given to the Court. A decree shall be drawn up in terms of the Consent Terms. A copy of the Consent Terms is marked ‘X’ for identification and is taken on record. Refund of Court fees shall be processed in accordance with applicable rules.

¶58

Considering that Defendant Nos.4 to 14 are being completely absolved in relation to the pleadings made against them, and considering the larger settlement that has been arrived at, there is no order as to costs. Although a bill of costs from these Defendants had been called for by a Learned Single Judge of this Court on an earlier

Page 4 of 5

February 18, 2026

Ashwini Vallakati

902-IA-6514-2025+.doc

¶63

occasion, I have also taken into account the scale of the amounts involved in the bills of costs and, to my mind, they represent a de minimis threshold , enabling a discharge of costs in this regard.

¶64

The Suit is finally disposed of in the aforesaid terms. Interim Applications, if any, connected to the captioned Suit also stand disposed of in the same terms.

¶65

All actions required to be taken pursuant to this order shall be taken upon receipt of a downloaded copy as available on this Court’s website.

¶66

[ SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN, J.]

¶67

Page 5 of 5

¶68

February 18, 2026

¶69

Ashwini Vallakati

Preeti M Bokadia v. Keemaya Build Pvt. Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Preeti M Bokadia v. Keemaya Build Pvt. Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Mathuradas Welfare Association vs Angelo Lobo

Phalke Niketan Cooperative Society Limited through Its Secretary Kishore Sopan Deshmukh vs Adit Enterprises through Its Sole Proprietor Amogh Gajanan Sawant

Bhartiya Kala Prasarani Sabha Throu.Its Sec. Pushkraj Bhalchandra Pathak vs Ld. Assistant Charity Commissioner IV Pune and Anr.

Rupesh Kumar Shah vs Basab Biraja Paul

Subhash Nagar Three star chsl vs G a builder private limited

Shashipal Kanhaiya Lal Kumawat Sole Proprietor of SP Construction vs Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited