Jehangir Jamshed Guzder v. Cyrus Jamshed Guzder
Case brief
What is this about?
Consent terms; amicable settlement; undertaking to Court; testamentary jurisdiction; interim applications disposed. Parties: Jehangir Jamshed Guzder (Applicant) v. Cyrus Jamshed Guzder and Ors. (Respondents). Bombay High Court, Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J., April 09, 2026; I.A. No. 4834 of 2025 in T.P. No. 387 of 2020 with I.A. No. 4835 of 2025 in T.P. No. 385 of 2020. Counsel: Askhay Vani, Manan Jaiswal, Hardik Tooshniwal (i/by MLS Vani and Associates) for Applicant; Jehangir Jejeebhoy, Shehzad A.K. Najam-es-sani, Shreya Satheesh (i/by Maneksha and Sethna) for Respondents.
What did the court decide?
Both Interim Applications (No. 4834 of 2025 in Testamentary Petition No. 387 of 2020 and No. 4835 of 2025 in Testamentary Petition No. 385 of 2020) disposed of in view of the consent terms; the statements in the consent terms accepted as undertakings given to the Court.