Sir Mohammed Yusuf Welfare Foundation Th its Member Secretary vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.

“1. The learned Advocate appearing for Respondent No.5-Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat, Nhave, makes a statement on instructions that the amount of Rs.45,00,000/- has been deposited with the gram Panchayat, Nhave, by the Petitioner.

¶22

The learned Advocate for the Petitioner, therefore, submits that the Petitioner is desirous to approach the Appellate Authority.

¶23

1 of 3

¶24

SUNNY THOTE

¶25

503-WP-3819-2026-(C).odt

¶26

The learned Advocate appearing for the Gram Panchayat, submits that Writ Petition is perfectly maintainable in this Court and after the order of the District Collector, the Petitioner does not have to approach the Konkan Commissioner/Appellate Authority.

¶27

The learned Advocate for the Petitioner submits that in the light of the above statement, notice maybe issued and since the Petitioner has deposited Rs.45,00,000/- with the Gram Panchayat, further coercive steps may be restrained by way of interim protection.

¶28

In view of the above, issue notice to the Respondents, returnable on 10^th June, 2026. The learned AGP waives service of notice on behalf of Respondent Nos.1 and 2. The learned Advocate waives service of notice on behalf of Respondent No.5.

¶29

Let affidavit in reply be filed on or before 20^th April, 2026. The rejoinder affidavit, if desired, be filed on or before 4^th May, 2026.

¶30

Since the Petitioner has deposited Rs.45,00,000/- with the Gram Panchayat, further coercive steps/precipitative action against the Petitioner, only restricting to the cause of action in this Petition, shall be restrained by way of interim relief.

¶31

8. In view of the above, the Interim Application is rendered infructuous and stands disposed off .”

¶32

Today, the learned Advocate for the Petitioner again

¶33

moved a praecipe praying that if the order is not signed, these matters may be taken up for recording that the Petitioner has the

¶34

2 of 3

¶35

SUNNY THOTE

¶36

503-WP-3819-2026-(C).odt

¶37

remedy of approaching the State, and not the Konkan Commissioner. The Petitioner, therefore, desires to withdraw the Writ Petition as well as the Interim Application and avail of the remedy.

¶38

As such, these matters were taken on the production board at 1:45 p.m. The learned Advocate for Respondent No.5, Mr. Rohit Parab is also present in the Court and submits that an appropriate order be passed.

¶39

In view of the above, the Writ Petition as well as the Interim Application are disposed off as withdrawn, on instructions, with liberty to the Petitioner to approach the State of Maharashtra. All contentions and objections of the litigating parties, even on maintainability, are kept open.

¶40

(ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.)

¶41

(RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.)

¶42

3 of 3

¶43

SUNNY THOTE

Sir Mohammed Yusuf Welfare Foundation Th its Member Secretary v. State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sir Mohammed Yusuf Welfare Foundation Th its Member Secretary v. State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Shri Vile Parle Kelavani Mandal Th. Chairman vs State of Maharashtra

Salim Shaikh and 5 Ors. vs Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and 5 Ors.

Janardhan Pyarelal Dubey vs the State of Maharashtra through the Secretary and 6 Ors.

Khushi Developers a Partnership Firm vs the State of Maharashtra through Government Pleader

Hiten Ramesh Rajgor vs Union of India

Narayan Sahadu Kokane vs Sub Divisional Officer and Ors.