Arpita Ashok Kane v. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai through Its Commisioner
Case brief
What is this about?
Bombay High Court common order dated 16/02/2026, Coram Ravindra V. Ghuge & Abhay Mantri, JJ.; matters not taken up at rising due to paucity of time; office objections to be removed within two weeks; ad-interim/interim orders to continue subject to compliance; affidavit in reply/rejoinder before next date; service of notice awaited - put up after service; petitioner to supply spare copies within 14 days; failure attracts dismissal against unserved respondents on 15th day; if copies supplied, notice returnable after four weeks; listing chart 24/03/2026 to 30/03/2026 with categories For Admission, For Compliance, HOB, For Disposal, For Direction, For Further Hearing, For Dismissal, Part Heard, Fresh Admission, For Urgent Admission, For Urgent Order, Due Admission; digitally signed by VISHAL SUBHASH PAREKAR; procedural/administrative order only.
What did the court decide?
Administrative/scheduling common order: office objections to be removed within two weeks; ad-interim/interim orders, if any, to continue subject to compliance; affidavits in reply/rejoinder, if any, before the next date; matters awaiting service to be put up after service; petitioners to supply spare copies within 14 days failing which matters stand dismissed against unserved respondents on the 15th day, and if supplied, notice to issue returnable after four weeks; matters listed per chart between 25/02/2026 and 30/03/2026.