Disposed

Darshan Sky High Realty v. Guru Chaya Co. Operative Housing Society

Bombay HC28 Jan 2026IA/283/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Interim application in an arbitration petition to implead Respondent Nos. 7 and 8. Court verified consent terms resolving disputes among petitioner and respondents, marked them 'X', took them on record, and disposed of the application.

What did the court decide?

Respondent Nos. 7 and 8 impleaded; consent terms taken on record and uploaded; interim application disposed of.

Darshan Sky High Realty vs Guru Chaya Co. Operative Housing Society — Arbitration | Bombay HC (2026)

¶1

1/2

¶2

4-IA-283-2026.DOC

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

¶4

INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 283 OF 2026

¶5

¶6

ARBITRATION PETITION NO.861 OF 2019

¶7

Darshan Sky High Realty ...Applicant

¶8

Versus

¶9

Guru chaya co operative Housing Society & Ors.

¶10

...Respondents

¶11

Mr. Rupesh Mandhare a/w Ashna Shah i/b Sean Wassoodew, for the Applicant. Ms. Hemali Dhande, for Respondent Nos.7 & 8.

¶12

CORAM : ARIF S. DOCTOR, J. DATE : 28th JANUARY, 2026

¶13

P.C.

¶14

The Respondent No.7 and 8 are impleaded as party Respondent to the captioned Petition.

¶15

Amendment to be carried out within a period of two weeks from today.

¶16

Learned counsel for the Petitioner and the Respondent Nos.6(a), 6(b), 7

¶17

and 8 have today tendered consent terms by which it is submitted that all the disputes and differences in the captioned Arbitration Petition have been amicably resolved amongst themselves. The execution of the consent terms is duly supported by the report of the Section Officer of this Court, which inter alia reads thus:

¶18

"The consent term are duly signed by the Authorized signatories of Applicant/ Petitioner and Respondents. The parties have admitted the contents of the Consent Terms. The Consent Terms are duly signed by the parties out of their free will without any undue influence and coercion. The Consent Terms are duly executed by the signatories."

¶19

Vaibhav

¶20

2/2

¶21

4-IA-283-2026.DOC

¶22

Having due regard to the fact that the consent terms have been duly executed and verified. The same are marked as “X” for identification and taken on record.

¶23

Needless to state that these consent terms shall not be binding on any third party non-signatories to the said consent terms and only operate to the signatories.

¶24

A soft copy of the Consent Terms will be uploaded as the second order in the matter. The Registry is to ensure that the hard copy of the signed Consent Terms is permanently retained on file as part of the record and is not sent for destruction in the ordinary course.

¶25

The Interim Application is accordingly disposed of.

¶26

ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.]

¶27

Vaibhav

Darshan Sky High Realty v. Guru Chaya Co. Operative Housing Society

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Darshan Sky High Realty v. Guru Chaya Co. Operative Housing Society

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Tarun Chandru Sadarangani vs Lokhandwala Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.

Glider Buildcon Realtors Private Limited vs Vke Plumbing Private Limited

Noorullah Shabuddin Tejani vs Simil Shopping Centre Cooperative Housing Society Ltd.

Perfect Space Infra LLP vs Charkop Nalanda Co. Operative Housing Society Limited

The Regents of the University of California vs Deputy Controller of Patents and Designs

Dotom Archbuild LLP vs Borivali (East) Patrakar Sadan Co-Operative Housing Society Ltd.