Allowed¶22

Vasudev Bhagwan Suryavanshi v. State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC6 Apr 2026IA/204/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bail condition modification; interim application in criminal appeal; ATS Kalachowki monthly attendance condition relaxed; reporting venue shifted to Rajarampuri Police Station, Kolhapur (every Tuesday, second week of month); applicant ordinarily resident of District Jalgaon (Yawal Taluka); prosecution/ATS Nashik raised no objection; State of Maharashtra respondent; Criminal Appeal No. 589 of 2024; Bombay High Court; no statute or precedent cited.

What did the court decide?

Condition No. (iv) of the Order dated 19th September 2024 modified; Applicant to mark attendance at Rajarampuri Police Station, Kolhapur on every Tuesday in the second week of every month between 10.00 a.m. and 12.00 noon; all other bail conditions maintained. ¶22

Vasudev Bhagwan Suryavanshi vs State of Maharashtra — Bombay HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

DTG 25-Ia-204-2026.doc

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶3

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 204 OF 2026 IN

¶5

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 589 OF 2024

¶6

Vasudev Bhagwan Suryavanshi … Applicant V/s.

¶7

The State of Maharashtra … Respondent

¶8

Mr. Karan L. Jain a/w Adv. Shrinidhi A. Sonak for Applicant. Mr. Vinod Chate, A.P.P. for Respondent-State. Mr. Mohan Dongre, ATS, Nashik, present.

¶9

CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND KAMAL KHATA, JJ. DATE : 15^th April 2026

¶10

P.C. :

¶11

This is an Application for modification of condition No. (iv) of Order dated 19^th September 2024, passed in Criminal Appeal No. 589 of 2024. Condition No. (iv) of the said Order reds as under :-

¶12

“(iv) The Appellants shall attend ATS Kalachowki, Mumbai on first

¶13

Monday of every month between 10.00 a.m. to 12.00 noon.”

¶14

Learned Advocate for Applicant submitted that, the Applicant is an ordinary resident of Indira Naggar Sakali, Taluka Yawal, District Jalgaon and it is very difficult for him to travel to Mumbai every month for marking

¶15

his attendance. He submitted that, the Applicant is also an accused in a crime

¶16

1/2

¶17

DTG 25-Ia-204-2026.doc

¶18

registered at Rajarampuri Police Station, Kolhapur and therefore the Applicant may be permitted to mark his presence in the present crime at Rajarampuri Police Station, Kolhapur itself.

¶19

Learned APP on instructions from Mr. Mohan Dongre, ATS, Nashik, submitted that, the prosecution has no serious objection for the said modification.

¶20

In view thereof, the condition No.(iv) of Order dated 19^th September 2024 is modified and the Applicant is hereinafter directed to attend the Rajarampuri Police Station, Kolhapur, on every Tuesday in the second week of every month between 10.00 a.m. and 12.00 noon.

¶21

Rest of the conditions of Order dated 19^th September 2024 imposed upon the Applicant while releasing him on bail are maintained.

¶22

Application is allowed in the aforesaid terms.

¶23

( KAMAL KHATA, J. ) ( A.S. GADKARI, J. )

¶24

2/2

Vasudev Bhagwan Suryavanshi v. State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vasudev Bhagwan Suryavanshi v. State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Asha Dutt Network Pvt. Ltd. Thoru. Director Asha Dutt vs State of Maharashtra Throu. Oficer of the Govt Pleader and Ors.

Surendra S/O Pundlik Gadling vs State of Maharashtra

Mamta Jagannath Shetty and Ors. vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Aftab Ahmed Hasan Sayyed vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Suresh Lalbahadur Singh vs State of Maharashtra

Amogh Moreshwar Ghaisas vs Principal Secretary Ministry Co-Operation and Marketing Dept of Cooperation, Marketing and Textile