Rohidas HlRU Pawshe v. SUNlL Ramsevak Pandey
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 – Sections 29A and 2(1)(e)
Case brief
What is this about?
Bombay High Court (Civil Appellate Jurisdiction), Somasekhar Sundaresan J., March 24, 2026 — Interim Application No. 1881 of 2026 in Arbitration Appeal No. 27 of 2017 (Rohidas Hiru Pawshe & Ors v. Sunil Ramsevak Pandey & Ors). Section 29A Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 petition filed on Appellate Side; venue of arbitration designated as Kalyan; relying on Jagdeep Chowgule v. Sheela Chowgule, 2026 INSC 92, held that jurisdiction under Section 29A lies before the Court under Section 2(1)(e); petition disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to approach the appropriate court. Keywords: Section 29A; Section 2(1)(e); venue of arbitration; Kalyan; jurisdiction; withdrawal.
What did the court decide?
Petition disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to approach the Court with jurisdiction under Section 2(1)(e) of the Act. ¶19