Disposed

Radhika Bandu Raut and Ors. v. Liberty General Insurance Ltd.

Bombay HC18 Mar 2026IA/161/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bombay High Court Kolhapur Circuit Bench; M. M. Sathaye J.; 18-03-2026; Interim Application 161 of 2026 in First Appeal 1301 of 2025; Liberty General Insurance Ltd. v. Radhika Bandu Raut; interim withdrawal of 50% of deposit before MACT Solapur on undertaking; accrued interest; balance invested per prevalent practice; supervision charges Rs. 300 per month; agricultural income source continues; ins

What did the court decide?

Applicants permitted to jointly withdraw 50% of the amount deposited by the Appellant–Insurance Company along with accrued interest, if any, subject to filing an undertaking before the Motor Accident

Radhika Bandu Raut and Ors. Vs Liberty General Insurance Ltd. — Bombay HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

13-IA-161-2026.doc

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶3

CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 161 OF 2026

¶5

¶6

FIRST APPEAL NO. 1301 OF 2025

¶7

Radhika Bandu Raut And Ors. … Applicants IN THE MATTER BETWEEN. Liberty General Insurance Ltd. … Appellant (Orig Res No. 2.) Versus Radhika Bandu Raut And Ors. … Respondents ***

¶8

Mr. Rupesh Bobade for the Applicants.

¶9

Mr. Aditya Ghadge h/f Mr. Phatak Sachin for the Appellant-Insurance Company.

¶10

¶11

CORAM : M. M. SATHAYE, J. DATE : 18^th March, 2026.

¶12

P. C. :

¶13

Heard learned Counsel for the parties.

¶14

This is an application filed by the claimants seeking withdrawal of the amount deposited by the Appellant–Insurance Company before the Tribunal. 3. Learned counsel for the Applicants submitted that the Claimants are the wife, children, and parents of the deceased, who was earning from agricultural income. He submitted that the deceased was the sole breadwinner of the family and that Claimants were dependent on the income of the deceased for their survival and welfare. He further submitted that the children of the deceased are pursuing their education and require financial support, and that the aged parents require funds for medical expenses.

¶15

Digitally signed by TALLE TALLE SHUBHAM SHUBHAM ASHOKRAO ASHOKRAO Date: 2026.03.18 17:33:13 +0530

Shubham

13-IA-161-2026.doc

Learned counsel for the appellant–Insurance Company opposed the application, contending, inter alia, that the only income claimed in the present case is from agriculture and, therefore, the source of income has not been lost. It is further contended that the loss assessed by the Tribunal at ₹300 per month towards supervision charges is on higher side. He also submitted that a deduction of one-fourth (1/4) ought to have been applied instead of the one-fifth (1/5) applied by the Tribunal.

¶20

Considered the submissions. Perused the impugned judgment, particularly paragraph Nos. 17 and 18 thereof. Considering that the loss has been assessed as supervision charges and that the source of income i.e. agricultural land, continues, in my view, at this stage, withdrawal of 50% of the amount can be permitted on undertaking. Hence, the following order is passed:

¶21

(a) Subject to the Applicants filing an undertaking before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Solapur, stating that the amount withdrawn shall be subject to the final outcome of the Appeal and that the Applicants shall bring back the amount withdrawn along with such interest as may be directed by the Court, the Applicants are permitted to jointly withdraw 50% of the amount deposited by the Appellant–Insurance Company along with accrued interest, if any.

¶22

(b) The remaining amount be invested as per the prevalent practice.

¶23

Interim Application is disposed of in the above terms.

¶24

[ M. M. SATHAYE, J. ]

¶25

¶26

Shubham

Radhika Bandu Raut and Ors. v. Liberty General Insurance Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Radhika Bandu Raut and Ors. v. Liberty General Insurance Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases