Ashok D. Bhuta v. Sanjay Ramchandra Parab
Case brief
What is this about?
Bombay High Court Appellate Side (Civil Jurisdiction); Sandeep V. Marne J; order dated 09-03-2026; consolidated mention/adjournment of Interim Applications Nos. 1545-1584 of 2026 in Civil Revision Applications Nos. 409/2023, 484-500/2023, 568-577/2023 and 610-621/2022; petitioner Ashok D. Bhuta (with others in several matters); respondents include Sanjay Ramchandra Parab, Harpal Singh, Brijo Chetandas Chawla, Naina Bhavesh Jain, Suresh Maruti Rane, Vakil Shayamrathi Singh, Dinesh C. Mehta, Malati Chandrakant Mehta, Jayantilal Narkeram Panchal, Arihant Enterprises, Brazil John Dsilva, M/s. Rehan Fastners, Sahadev Balaji Korgaokar, Subadra Hari Yadav, Sharda Ravindra Singh, M/s. Prakash Electronics, M/s. V. M. Plating, legal representatives of Kesrichand Jivachand Shah, Vinod Banslochan Singh, Jaswant Singh Bhogal, legal representatives of Taramathi Panchal, Sunil Morar Panchal, Shubhash Dayaram Panchal, Nilam Nandakishor Triookar, Savitri Vakil Singh, legal representatives of Jayarama Kurumbila Poojari, Satish Shekhar Poojari, Kamala K. Bhatia, Kodomudi Ramchandran Laxminarayan, Nammi Swarnsheel Jain, Mukesh Waman Parab, Manohar Bala Madhgut, Chandrakant Nagvekar, Harcharan Singh Kuljit Singh, Ravindra Pawhari Singh, Tazhe Purayil Dakshyani, Ravindra Narayan Kale, Jaysukh Shantilal Salot; counsel: Adv. Hersh Choksi i/b Kanga and Co; result: stood over to 07/04/2026, ad-interim relief if any continued; no statutes, precedents, issues or holdings.